Like so many of us growing up in the 50s, crisco was a fact of life, and many recipes i relied on contained it. I didn;t question it much in my 20s, but when i came here around age 25, there was no crisco. When i asked people if it existed they asked why use it instead of oil or butter, and i said, because it has no taste. They answered, so why would you use it? Which got me thinking. Yeah, why DO we use it?
I began to use butter for all baking and oil for all frying and cooking, and in fact, stuff tastes much better.
For the flakiness of pastry, i recently tried lard, and well, there is NO CONTEST - way better than any crisco pastry i ever had.
For buttercreams, of course, butter is way tastier, and i guess some would argue that it's not completely white,. And i say, so, is white any more appetizing than ivory or cream colored?
I distrust industrial products, and especially industrial products that are advertized as healthier than natural ones. Don';t get me wrong, there are plenty of natural poisons, just because it's natural it doesn;t mean it;s good for you, but at least highly processed ingredients contain substances that are so new we don;t really know much about them and esp their long-term effects.
And just try this if you want to find out if crisco is better than butter - just taste it!
Pure, tasteless grease. bla.