- Joined: April 2000
- Location: Montréal
- Post Count: 3,617
First time I try a dish I will follow the recipe. The second time I do it, I’ll adapt it to my taste. This may sound strange but it is a question of respect. The author went to a lot of trouble to provide me with a recipe she/he developed and perfected with time. The least I can do is to follow the directions she/he provides. Isn’t that why I bought the book in the first place?
Baking has to be approach differently. The margin of error is a lot smaller. You need to get an understanding of the let’s say bread making process before you can successfully modify a recipe. You have to understand the role of each ingredient before changing the quantity. It’s also where the fun is. You look at four or six pastry book and each will provide you a different recipe for a génoise. If you’re careful and understand why each ingredient is there you can create another recipe based on the recipes you already have. That’s where the fun is.
When I get a little money, I buy books. And if there is any left over, I buy food.
- Desiderius Erasmus
-
chiffonade
- Professional Chef
- offline
- Joined: November 2001
- Location: Florida (for now)
- Post Count: 859
Comfort level has a lot to do with it...
Recipes serve as different things to different people at differing levels of experience. Some use them as a "guide" and others live and die by every punctuation mark.
Those with little experience (on their way to becoming kitchen whizzes) tend to abide by every instruction in a published recipe. When a recipe is flawed and doesn't work, a newbie cook will blame themselves, insisting it was something they did wrong because no one questions a published recipe. This mentality is inside a box where no one should live.
Once someone knows the basic physical/chemical reactions that take place during the different methods of cooking, the world is their oyster. They develop the "eye" to see what recipes won't work and how to implement the use of their chosen ingredients without a written recipe because they've done it before, know how to do it and know what to expect as the end result.
I tend to make subtle changes in recipes as I see fit. This happens less frequently in baking because certain chemical reactions need balance to take place. Baking recipes are more structured and need to be followed more closely, but you can bend them somewhat. For instance, I use whole wheat flour in place of some white flour (gotta get that good stuff in where you can) and even do so in sweet goods. For raisins, I'll use craisins or chopped up dried mango, etc. To save fat, I'll broil a food where frying has been prescribed, i.e. "oven fried" french-fries or eggplant slices. A change in technique serves the individual cook as per their needs but you have to know what the end result should be in order to substitute one technique for another.
I'll read a recipe, think to myself, "I've got all of that," put the magazine or book down and go into the kitchen using my own techniques to arrive at a product resembling the recipe I just read. The recipe sparked an idea or suggested to me "go make this because you have everything you need and it looks good." It didn't become a God-engraved tablet for me to live by. This comes with time and experience.
Food is sex for the stomach.