ChefTalk Cooking Forums
    Cooking ArticlesCookbook ReviewsCooking ForumsRecipesCooking Glossary  

Welcome to the ChefTalk Cooking Forums forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

Go Back   ChefTalk Cooking Forums > Food and Cooking Forums > Beverage Reviews
Register Blogs Photo Gallery FAQ Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Beverage Reviews Reviews, commentary, and updates on a variety of beverages, thanks to our friends at BevReview.com.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 08-29-2007, 01:13 PM
Luc_H's Avatar
Registered User
Culinary Experience: Food Writer
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Montreal
Posts: 600
Luc_H is on a distinguished road
Default High fructose corn syrup (HFCS)

This is the first article that clearly links diabetes and HFCS.
In my cooking class I explain why calorie for calorie HFCS is worst then sugar and I make a good argument already. although this article does not dispute my explanations it adds to my concerns.

I foresee that this article could be a turning point that signals the beginning of the end for HFCS in food (probably years from now). Pretty soon the wave of discontent for this ingredient will swell like it did for transfats.

Soft drinks with HFCS may be a risk factor for diabetes

What do you think?
Luc H
__________________
I eat science everyday, do you?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

  #2  
Old 08-29-2007, 01:30 PM
Registered User
Culinary Experience: I Just Like Food
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 786
Free Rider is on a distinguished road
Default

I hate HFCS and it's put in everything these days, which is why I try to make everything fresh (time is a problem). Not only that, but they're nicking my cranberries so that can add HFCS to them.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-29-2007, 04:41 PM
Mezzaluna's Avatar
Cafe Moderator
Culinary Experience: Cook At Home
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Wisconsin USA
Posts: 8,078
Mezzaluna is on a distinguished road
Arrow

As someone who must limit sugars of all types, including natural sugars in fruits, honey, etc. for health reasons, I'm not at all surprised by the findings. HFCS hides in many processed foods, putting consumers in the position of having to be chemists and food scientists just to do the weekly marketing.

As many here would agree, I'm not happy to have to use Splenda (sucralose) and Equal (aspartame). The ironic thing for me is that I didn't have a sweet tooth until I went on NutriSystem 17 years ago for 16 months and began consuming more artificially sweetened foods than ever in my life.
__________________
Moderator, Welcome Forum
***It is better to ask forgiveness than beg permission.***
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-29-2007, 06:31 PM
kuan's Avatar
Registered User
Culinary Experience: Professional Chef
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 3,792
kuan will become famous soon enough
Default

It's not that bad if you eat HFCS a little at a time. Your body can only metabolize a coupla hundred kcal per hour. Eat 400 kcal of sugar in 5 minutes and you'll get diabetes too.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-31-2007, 12:12 AM
shel's Avatar
Registered User
Culinary Experience: Cook At Home
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: San Francisco Bay Area, California, USA
Posts: 2,485
shel is on a distinguished road
Default

Thanks for posting the link. I've passed it on to some friends.

I'd really like to see HFCS and may other ingredients get out of our food. But that won't happen any time soon - too many people don't give a rat's patoot - all they want is cheap food. Can't blame them too much on that point.

I really, really try not to eat anything with additives, colors, preservatives, stabilizers, and anything with an ingredient that I'm unsure of. But there's so much hidden crap in our foods, so many companies lie to us or misrepresent their product, that it's hard to know what you're eating half the time. Why the heck do we need yellow dye in Vlasic pickles, for example? How many people even know that there is yellow dye in Vlasic pickles?

When companies like Monsanto make the laws governing our food, it's very difficult for most people to eat uncompromised food.

Shel

Last edited by shel : 08-31-2007 at 01:35 AM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-31-2007, 06:41 AM
Registered User
Culinary Experience: Can't boil water
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: SLC UT
Posts: 2,529
phatch is on a distinguished road
Default

We don't even really have to change the laws.

If there were a quality food consortium, they could supply a recognizable label of quality ingredients much the way UL does for home electrical gizmos or the ADA labels toothpaste and other such PRIVATE organizations. It could be done quicker, cheaper and without lobbyist input.

With the rash of Natural type food stores, I believe many brands would want such an independent label on their current quality products to help differentiate them in the market place.

Phil
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-31-2007, 07:20 AM
Mezzaluna's Avatar
Cafe Moderator
Culinary Experience: Cook At Home
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Wisconsin USA
Posts: 8,078
Mezzaluna is on a distinguished road
Smile

Besides, if they use more corn for alternative fuels, maybe the price of it will rise enough to make it a less-desireable ingredient from a marketing/pricing standpoint. I see signs posted in my supermarket explaining that the price of milk has risen as dairy cows' feed corn price has gone up due to so much corn being diverted to ethanol production.

Maybe we'll also be able to solve the feed problem with cattle (grain vs. grazing) because of this.
__________________
Moderator, Welcome Forum
***It is better to ask forgiveness than beg permission.***
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-31-2007, 01:07 PM
BevReview Steve's Avatar
Host of BevReview.com
Culinary Experience: Beverage Expert
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 382
BevReview Steve is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by phatch View Post
We don't even really have to change the laws.
It's not so much the laws as it is the tax breaks and subsidies, from what I understand.
Quote:
They replaced the original sugar formula with high fructose corn syrup (HFCS). Today, that sweetener is used in pretty much all soft drinks in the U.S. Why? Two reasons (if you believe the commonly held political explanation). The first is cost. HFCS is cheaper thanks to subsidies that the government provides to grow and use corn. The second is tariffs that are placed on the purchase of sugar, which makes it more expensive to buy. This is why sugar is still used in Canada and other countries to sweeten soft drinks, but everything in America uses high fructose corn syrup.
Source

The recent news reports on diabetes I think opened a lot of eyes in the mainstream, and I think that's (thankfully) opened the door for cane sugar beverages to get more exposure.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-31-2007, 03:08 PM
Luc_H's Avatar
Registered User
Culinary Experience: Food Writer
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Montreal
Posts: 600
Luc_H is on a distinguished road
Default

Some little correction here:
Sugar is not used in beverages in Canada HFCS is.

Canada is a sugar producer and prices in Canada for sugar is cheaper then in USA. Canada does not have the farm bill/corn subsidies found in the USA yet HFCS is still economical to use rather then sugar.
Some reasons are:
no dissolving required nor heat involved with HFCS because it is liquid and readily dissolves in water.
HFCS does not crystallize.
HFCS does not cloud nor yellow clear beverages.
weight per weigh or calorie per calorie or at the same brix, HFCS is sweeter then sugar because it is composed of 55% fructose and 45%glucose which is sweeter then the disaccharide sucrose (table sugar) which is 50:50 fructose:glucose.

(by the way, Kosher for passover Coke IS TRULY better then the regular stuff)

PS: I have heard rumours that 7UP has switch to using sucrose instead of HFCS (I can't confirm this). Their marketing is gearing towards all from NATURE ingredients.

Luc H
__________________
I eat science everyday, do you?

Last edited by Luc_H : 08-31-2007 at 03:12 PM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-31-2007, 04:57 PM
Registered User
Culinary Experience: Professional Chef
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 1,049
foodpump is on a distinguished road
Default

HFCS is used for two main reasons, the first being cheaper than sugar. The other reason is that the more sugar/HFCS/ you dump in a product, the longer shelf life you have, and a side benefit is that it adds weight too!

Look at the producer's point of view: The development and advertising costs are enormous to bring out a new product, add to that, developing the machinery and production lines. So you gotta have a loooong shelf life, hydrogenated fats really helps too, but the more sugar/HFCS you dump in there, the longer shelf life you have. Besides, "preservatives" is a dirty word, glucose/ sugar, isn't--yet. With a long shelf life you can make a product run every month or so, and run other products on the same line too.

So it's a whole system to attack, the producers produce what the marketing people figure will sell, and the distributers demand a long shelf life in order to distribute the product.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 08-31-2007, 05:39 PM
Luc_H's Avatar
Registered User
Culinary Experience: Food Writer
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Montreal
Posts: 600
Luc_H is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by foodpump View Post
HFCS is used for two main reasons, the first being cheaper than sugar. The other reason is that the more sugar/HFCS/ you dump in a product, the longer shelf life you have, and a side benefit is that it adds weight too!
I hate to disagree with you Foodpump but If you add sugar or HFCS to a food product (unless you add tons in it) you do not extent the shelflife of the product you actually make it susceptible to yeast and mold and for that reason you will need to use a preservative (sorbate or benzoate) to give the product some shelflife or hotpack (sterilize/pasteurize).

HFCS (and sugar) is used mainly for volume (adding heft cheaply), for moisture/evaporation control (keeping things nice and malleable), overall mouth feel, for taste enhancement (sweetness is what consumers like), Masking agent (reducing bitterness, acidity) and overall customer taste appeal.

I know this well because I have worked intimately with food development at food processors for 20 years. What is sad when you work with R&D people is to find out how many of them do not know how to cook so will believe everything an industrial chemical rep will give them.

HFCS is so heavily subsidies and dirt cheap, every food processors starts by this ingredient when developing a new food product.

Luc H
__________________
I eat science everyday, do you?

Last edited by Luc_H : 08-31-2007 at 05:42 PM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 09-18-2007, 09:38 AM
shel's Avatar
Registered User
Culinary Experience: Cook At Home
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: San Francisco Bay Area, California, USA
Posts: 2,485
shel is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by phatch View Post
With the rash of Natural type food stores, I believe many brands would want such an independent label on their current quality products to help differentiate them in the market place.
I'm skeptical since many of ther organic and natural producvts are owned and made by the same major corporations that are providing the crap we're complaining about.

Shel
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 09-18-2007, 10:16 AM
Registered User
Culinary Experience: Can't boil water
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: SLC UT
Posts: 2,529
phatch is on a distinguished road
Default

In markets where such labels are available such as the UL listing for electrical things, ADA for toothpaste, they are sought out by both the consumer and the manufacturer.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 11-06-2007, 07:20 AM
Registered User
Culinary Experience: Line Cook
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2
CelestePect is on a distinguished road
Default Hfcs

I've been living an organic lifestyle in the past three years, i'm really avoiding anything which has HFCS or other artificial flavors in. There is an awesome natural product, Stevia, which is discovered long time ago, an herb and it's is many times sweeter than sugar but still good for people with diabetes. You can find many info about it on the internet. The controversy is mainly because the sugar industry don't really want you to know about it. They haven't found any negative side effect consuming Stevia, it's natural and in my mind natural is always better than artificial. In Europe they are using it more more nowadays.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 11-06-2007, 08:37 AM
Registered User
Culinary Experience: Retired Chef
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 283
stir it up is on a distinguished road
Default

HFCS is the devil as far as I'm concerned. I read a book called Fat Nation a while ago, that talked about how food policy has evolved and its effects, and it also talks about how the liver makes cholesterol out of HFCS too if I remember correctly.

My understanding of food labelling is that they can just simply call it "sugar" in a list of ingredients.

I recently heard a radio documentary on the processing of corn (most corn is grown for HFCS). They were discussing how they want to use the remaining corn by-products as animal feed, but when they feed it to farmed fish, the flesh comes out a horrible deathly putrid looking GREY. So their scientists were busy at work trying to figure out more chemicals and processes to take away the grey effect.

Celeste, I got wicked headaches from Stevia.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
glucose vs corn syrup rzn Pastries and Baking General 3 05-30-2006 08:06 PM
Fructose allergy/Icing Color Help sueinaz Pastries and Baking General 5 03-02-2006 08:24 AM
Fructose taking a bad rap phatch Food & Cooking Questions and Discussion 7 04-08-2004 09:55 PM
Corn Syrup Suzy Pastries and Baking General 1 07-02-2001 11:34 AM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0
© 1998 - 2006 ChefTalk.com • All rights reservedAd Management by RedTyger

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118