Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jock I'm not saying that the Hobart 5qt isn't a good machine in a residential application. I'm just saying it isn't worth the extra you pay over the cost of a KA mixer.
Hobart is the undisputed king of food mixers and that's why I started to buy the 5 quart for the school instead of KA. Within 2 weeks the first Hobart failed. When the service tech came to fix it I was incenced and I said to him, "I spent $1,200 for the Hobart name and quality and the damned thing didn't last any longer than a KA at 1/3 the price. Why am I spending all that money?" His response was, "I don't know. Why are you?"
I'd be willing to bet too that the materials and manufacturing processes today are very different from those in 1947.
Jock |
My mixer was used for it's first 50 years
in a commercial kitchen before I took it home. Yes, it was serviced every two years by Hobart, to ensure it kept running well, but it had no breakdowns while in use. After hard usage for 50 years, I retired it when I myself retired and now it is used in my home kitchen.
The only difference (I know of) between it and the new Hobart mixers is my mixer has a removable fuse on the back of the machine.
The Hobart shop did tell me, they felt my 1947 N-50 was probably a better machine than the new ones.
But that being said, the new Hobart N-50 mixers are still the best 5 quart mixers out there in my opinion. What I have observed in restaurants, hospitals, institutions, and other commercial kitchen; and what I read on internet cooking forums, support what I am saying.
Is it possible you were unfortunate enough to get your hands on a bad couple of mixers?