![]() | |
| Cooking Articles • Cookbook Reviews • Cooking Forums • Recipes • Cooking Glossary |
| |||||||
| Cooking Equipment Reviews Find out what equipment best suits your needs. Share your experiences with various kitchen equipment products, gadgets, and more. |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools |
|
#1
| ||||
| ||||
| Howdy all, I've read through this forum and not found an answer to my question. Please forgive me if it's already been hashed and I just missed it. I want to replace all the junk I've been cooking with (except my 12" cast-iron skillet, of course). I have my choices down to the Calphalon One Infused Anodized 10-pc set (NOT Nonstick) or the All-clad Stainless 10-pc set. I know buying a pre-packaged set is not "preferred", but compared to the prices of Open Stock, I'll get just about everything I want, plus some extra pieces for about the same money. I'm leaning towards the C1. But I have seen here that All-clad is a HEAVY favorite amongst you all. If I believe the Calphalon Marketing department, the C1 stuff will cook just as well as the All-clad, but with less sticking and easier clean-up. The only downside (compared to the AC SS) is they are not dishwasher-safe. Cosmetics-wise, they both look fine to me, so looks are not a factor in my decision. I'm okay with not putting the C1 stuff in the dishwasher. So, is the Calphalon Marketing department to be believed? Or would it be more truthful to say the C1 stuff cooks nearly as well and the real decision is whether I trade a bit of "stick"-iness and easy cleanup for slightly (?) better cooking? Any advice would be greatly appreciated. - Stuart Last edited by StuartV; 02-03-2006 at 01:23 PM. |
|
#2
| ||||
| ||||
| Welcome to the forum! I hope you get a response from someone who has both, and uses both at home. If I had to choose between the two alternatives you gave no doubt I'd go with the All-clad. Quote:
Good luck and happy cooking whatever you decide. Let us know how it turned out. |
|
#3
| ||||
| ||||
| I wouldn't let the "dishwasher safe" issue affect my decision at all. I simply don't believe that you should put any pot or pan in the dishwasher. |
|
#4
| ||||
| ||||
| I have, and use, both. I have not found the Calphelon One to be as 'non stick' as they claim. I really have not found it any better than the older Calphelon professional. I do like my AllClad, but I have other brands that work well also. I have never bought a set of cookware, but pick up one of these, or one of those, when a bargain presents itself. |
|
#5
| ||||
| ||||
| ALL CLAD. Plain and simple. Mark
__________________ Salad is the kind of food that real food eats. |
|
#6
| ||||
| ||||
| Skillet, thanks for the response. CastIron, I agree that it's not a factor in my decision. Mannlicher, thanks for the response. I was hoping to hear from somebody that had and uses both. As it happens, I got a NIB 10-pc. set of the C1 on eBay this morning for $350. Compared to what I'd pay to buy individual pieces of this and that, I figure even if I only end up really using 2 of the pots or pans in this set, I won't have really lost much money. And I'll have a bunch of extra stuff that will probably come in handy occasionally. MarkV, the question is plain, but I haven't found it to be simple. If you can possibly explain what it is about the AC (compared to the C1) that makes the answer so simple, I would appreciate it. I may yet buy some of the AC stuff. As it is, besides you all, I asked the one and only prof. chef that I know personally the same question I posted here and she basically told me I'd probably be happier with the C1 stuff, which is why I went ahead and jumped on what looked like a good deal on eBay.
__________________ - Stuart |
|
#7
| ||||
| ||||
| Most importantly, All Clad is heavier gauge. This provides better heat retention and distribution, and along with superior construction, means your grandchildren will be able to cook with them. Mark
__________________ Salad is the kind of food that real food eats. |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| and you have the debate on none stick being toxic which is fuming up again. I read a review by CI which said they did not find the new Calphelon One none stick to be very good. I must say never found a none stick yet that stayed none stick very long even Excailber used on Ultrex scraches and food begins to stick. Stainless steel and CI recomends to put oil in the pan when heating it. The oil will begin to ripple or smoke which lets you know when it's at the right temp. They also said not to move the food around but wait until it starts to brown since this will free it from the pan. It's hard to just let it sit but i have learned to. ![]() http://www.consumersearch.com/www/ki...fullstory.html Calphalon's most recent line, Calphalon One (*est. $580/10-piece set), claims to have "the best qualities of both traditional metal and nonstick cookware," so Cook's Illustrated put it to the test. The review pitted Calphalon One against the editors' favorite traditional and nonstick skillets from All-Clad. Cook’s Illustrated found that scraping was required to flip salmon filets and hash browns. Stir-fry chicken and scrambled eggs did not release from the pan as they would from a traditional nonstick. In conclusion, Cook's Illustrated's review found that Calphalon One is an expensive choice that can't replace a regular nonstick skillet. Note that Cook’s Illustrated found the Calphalon One's skillet to perform well with seared steak. It provided good color, crust development and adequate fond (the little crusty bits left behind in the pan that help create a rich sauce). Last edited by Dagger; 02-11-2006 at 11:24 AM. |
|
#9
| ||||
| ||||
| just wanted to throw this out if there is a Marshalls near you. I just bought everyone in the kitchen a present. They had allclad alum. 10" skillets $25, 8qt stock pot$43. etc. they also had many non stick all clad but a little higher in price. I can't tell you how old my stainless/alum is but I did buy a non stick 8 qt with lid just to try. $71,99 |
|
#10
| ||||
| ||||
| I just wanted to follow up on this now that I have received my Calphalon One cookware. It is NOT the Nonstick variety. I have only cooked one thing so far that I thought was any kind of "test" at all. The first step of which was browning some hamburger meat. When I cook this, I normally expect to end up with some meat stuck to the bottom of the pan afterwards that requires a little scrubbing to get out. Maybe that's because I've never cooked with good quality cookware before. Anyway, with the C1, the meat browned perfectly. It cooked evenly all over. And I didn't have any trouble with anything sticking to the pan. Cleanup was as easy as could be. A good swipe with some soapy water and the green scrubby side of a sponge and it was done. Maybe All-clad stainless would clean up as easy. I don't know. But I don't think it could have been any easier. And since my food cooked perfectly, I am very happy with the C1. Thanks again to everyone that took the time to provide some constructive input.
__________________ - Stuart |
|
#11
| |||
| |||
| I'm a casual chef (I cook at least twice a week and I'm pretty good.) Initially, I used non-stick cookware because it's usually easier to clean. Since then, I started using stainless steel cookware and I love the heat conductibility. I use more oil and butter, but I don't mind. I also don't have any problem cleaning my stainless steel pans because now I just use Ajax, S.O.S., or steel wool. It's great! Anyway... I compiled all my thoughts (and some other peoples') on Comparati.com. Just go there and search 'stainless steel cookware' vs 'non-stick cookware.' It simplifies things. |
|
#12
| |||
| |||
| Quote:
I'm not sure what to think about questions like this. Sorry I'm so late to answer. Great pans don't always clean up well. Pans that clean up well only cook well with a small number of things. I have ALL-Clad and Mauviel with Calphalon One for non-stick. You only use non-stick pans for a very small number of things like stirfry and cooking eggs. Most everything you're going to use a "stick" pan for. Even though they told you it was not non-stick it sure looks like non-stick to me - "Infused anodized cookware provides a smooth metal surface that is stick-resistant. Interior and exterior surfaces are infused with an advanced release polymer.". Maybe they're avoiding the non-stick label because of the scare over the healthiness of the non-stick coating. For browning hamburger you probably could have used just about anything. Make a pan sauce in it and you'll see the difference between cookware in the All-Clad/Mauviel range and Calphalon One. I guess what this comes down to is use the best tool for the job. Calphalon One will probably be great for browning hamburger and cooking eggs but I wouldn't try anything complex in it if I had another choice. Grant |
|
#13
| |||
| |||
| grantmasterflas is right. I typically only use non-stick if I'm cooking something frozen, which isn't often at all, or eggs or something. Everything else is much better in all-clad. I bought the stainless set and a couple of extra non-sticks for the special occasion. |
|
#14
| |||
| |||
| Quote:
|
|
#15
| ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
shel |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| All-Clad Stainless in 3 months. | Stephanie Brim | Cooking Equipment Reviews | 3 | 12-08-2005 07:00 AM |
| Difference between All-Clad Stainless and MC2? | ksatterwhite | Cooking Equipment Reviews | 1 | 11-24-2003 09:57 AM |
| Cleaning All-Clad Stainless Steel | littlegem | Cooking Equipment Reviews | 17 | 08-29-2003 11:10 AM |
| All-Clad Stainless Steel vs. MC2 | littlegem | Cooking Equipment Reviews | 3 | 05-01-2003 07:03 PM |
| All-Clad MasterChef vs. All-Clad Stainless | Risa | Cooking Equipment Reviews | 6 | 11-12-2001 08:06 AM |