| Food & Cooking Questions and Discussion Got a cooking question or something you want to discuss about food and cooking? This is the forum for you. Talk about anything related to food & cooking. |  | | 
08-24-2003, 07:42 AM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: May 2003 Location: NJ
Posts: 577
| | Lobster Consomme Dear Friends:
My executive chef made a lobster consomme yesterday that turned out cloudy and very un-consomme like. I have never made a lobster consomme, only consommes from chicken or veal stock. Below is his methodology. Could I get please get your opinions about what you think might have gone wrong.
1) First he took live lobsters and pulled off their tails and claws. These were used for something else. The head/upper part of the body of each lobster was then cut in half and the guts scraped out.
2) He then sauteed the halved heads in a rondeau pan in olive oil. (In my opinion the pan was way overcrowded and the pieces were not browning evenly. There was not a single layer of heads but a pile of them on top of each other.)
3) To facilitate the browning he then transferred the rondeau to a convection oven and finished them there.
4) Meanwhile we caramelized mirepoix & garlic in olive oil.
5) Then the sauteed/roasted heads and the carmelized mirepoix was added to a stockpot with chicken stock and water. (Here's one potential problem. The chicken stock, if not made properly could have been cloudy from either inadequate straining/degreasing or being cooked above a simmer).
6) It was brought to a simmer and then he added a raft of egg whites and fresh mirepoix. No ground beef.
7) That was then simmered for however long he simmered it for. Finally he ladled the consomme out of the pot through the traditional hole in the raft with the previously stated cloudy results.
What do you guys think?
Mark | 
08-24-2003, 08:47 AM
|  | Registered User Culinary Experience: Professional Chef | | Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Vermont, USA
Posts: 250
| | Start looking for a new job.
Seriously, do.
All of those steps to f it up by adding the raft to sommering liquid? No,no,no!
Arrrghhh!
Consomme is my favorite zen like thing to do and this person is ruining my zen! Now I have to make some Chai tea.
sorry, lost track there for a second...
Ground beef is not needed for a raft.
If I was making a lobster consomme I'd make a lobster stock from the shells and insides. Cool it over night. then add a raft of egg whites, shells, mirepoix, more shells and insides(ground up). bring it to a simmer stirring it every 4 minutes by hand until it is too hot for my hand which is around 140. That's when the raft will form. Watch it closely to not boil or even really simmer.. 45 to 55 minutes later turn off heat and ladel consomme through cheese cloth. Adjust seasoning and enjoy your karma. | 
08-24-2003, 08:53 AM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: louisiana
Posts: 146
| | ditto,,,,,,,,, all your chef accomplished was a really lame a ss lobster stock. | 
08-24-2003, 08:56 AM
|  | ChefTalk Moderator Culinary Experience: Professional Chef | | Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Fond du Lac, WI
Posts: 2,974
| | I like to use ground meat of some sort for my raft. It helps to make it more stable. For the lobster consumme I would have used ground, raw shrimp added to the whites, or if cost was an issue, then some ground chicken breast, which would contribute little flavor to the finished product, but definately not ground beef.
__________________ From Man's sweat and God's love, beer came into the World-Saint Arnoldus | 
08-24-2003, 09:05 AM
|  | Registered User Culinary Experience: Professional Chef | | Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Vermont, USA
Posts: 250
| | exactly | 
08-24-2003, 09:39 AM
|  | ChefTalk Moderator Culinary Experience: Culinary Instructor | | Join Date: Jul 2000 Location: CT.
Posts: 5,087
| | Quote: Originally posted by miahoyhoy Ground beef is not needed for a raft.
If I was making a lobster consomme I'd make a lobster stock from the shells and insides. Cool it over night. then add a raft of egg whites, shells, mirepoix, more shells and insides(ground up). bring it to a simmer stirring it every 4 minutes by hand until it is too hot for my hand which is around 140. That's when the raft will form. Watch it closely to not boil or even really simmer.. 45 to 55 minutes later turn off heat and ladel consomme through cheese cloth. Adjust seasoning and enjoy your karma. | This is the technique I also recommend. You may use leeks,garlic and onions in your clarification as well in lobster consomme.
Using chicken stock for a Lobster consomme is not such a great idea,wine and fish fumet or lobster fond should be used.
MarkV,
in some things we cook technique is paramount for it's success.
I don't want to say bad things about your boss but it seems his/her technique was off.Try it at home useing the technique qouted above,only before you strian it let it sit for 15/20 minutes.
Note..I like a touch of Pernod in my consomme.
__________________ Baruch ben Rueven / Chana
"If the sun refused to shine, I will still be lovin you. Mountains crumble to the sea, it will still be you and me" | 
08-24-2003, 09:40 AM
|  | Registered User | | Join Date: May 2003 Location: NJ
Posts: 577
| | I'm assuming you guys are against the ground beerf because it was a lobster consomme?
Meaning, if it was a beef or chicken consomme, ground beef would have been OK?
Mark | 
08-24-2003, 09:50 AM
|  | ChefTalk Moderator Culinary Experience: Culinary Instructor | | Join Date: Jul 2000 Location: CT.
Posts: 5,087
| | Mark,
For a chicken consomme I prefere to use a vegetable clarification over ground beef for more purity of flavor and the natural gelitines in the veggies work well.
For a beef consomme I use ground knuckle face or shoulder clod.
__________________ Baruch ben Rueven / Chana
"If the sun refused to shine, I will still be lovin you. Mountains crumble to the sea, it will still be you and me" | 
08-24-2003, 10:34 AM
|  | ChefTalk Moderator Culinary Experience: Professional Chef | | Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Fond du Lac, WI
Posts: 2,974
| | I like some kind of meat in my raft. Personal preference because that is how I was trained. I also find that it makes for a sturdier raft. One that holds together a little more tightly, and less likely to break apart during straining. For beef consummes, then definately beef, for chicken then chicken and for seafood then ground shellfish or chicken. Fish does not work for making a raft.
__________________ From Man's sweat and God's love, beer came into the World-Saint Arnoldus | 
08-25-2003, 07:42 AM
|  | ChefTalk Moderator Culinary Experience: Professional Chef | | Join Date: Jun 2001 Location: Minnesota
Posts: 4,119
| | In principle, the stock should have clarified. Sometimes things fall in the consomme or the mirepoix is cut too big. A drop of wine will cloud the consomme as could many other things.
The chef made a good effort and who knows, it may have worked before. With a little tweaking and ground lean meat it might actually turn out. The proteins in lean meat actually help in the clarification process. I'd encourage him to try again, say... "chef, how about we try and make it even clearer?"
Kuan | 
08-25-2003, 09:45 AM
|  | ChefTalk Moderator Culinary Experience: Professional Chef | | Join Date: May 2001 Location: New York, NY
Posts: 3,742
| | Making consomme is at least a two-step process, as someone already pointed out: first you make the stock; then, optionally, you concentrate it; finally, you add the ingredients of the raft to the COLD stock and simmer very very gently. We can all agree that MarkV's chef rushed the process. And used an inadequate raft, added improperly.
I don't really think the crowding in the rondeau would make much difference, as long as the contents were stirred sufficiently. Nor do I have much of a problem with using chicken stock. I would prefer fumet or shrimp stock plus water; but maybe the chef wanted to use up the chix.
But how did he think he's get a good raft with only egg whites and mirepoix? Just not enough protein material to hold onto the impurities. And to add it to the simmering stock (still with the shells, etc., I assume) would only allow bits of it to make the stock worse, not better.
We don't know why the chef rushed that process. Could have been for a lot of other reasons besides ignorance. So MarkV may not need a new job  -- unless the chef does that sort of thing all the time (or has the staff do it so improperly). | 
08-26-2003, 12:23 PM
|  | ChefTalk Moderator Culinary Experience: Professional Chef | | Join Date: May 2001 Location: New York, NY
Posts: 3,742
| | Additional information for those interested in comsomme:
There is a session on consomme over on eGullet, as part of the eGullet Culinary Institute. The original lesson is here, and the Q and A is here. | 
08-26-2003, 12:50 PM
|  | ChefTalk Moderator Culinary Experience: Professional Chef | | Join Date: Jun 2001 Location: Minnesota
Posts: 4,119
| | This is why I can't write recipes. I looked at the method Mark posted and assumed he strained and defatted it, after all it's basic right? Good catch Suzanne. Be honest, did anyone else catch that?
Kuan (can't read) | 
08-28-2003, 02:07 PM
| | Registered User | | Join Date: May 2003 Location: Michigan
Posts: 82
| | I've had sucess clarifying stocks with only egg whites and shells. It must be a pretty good stock to begin with though...otherwise I'll add a pertinent protein. I always use it for a sweet corn consomme that's only veg stock anyway...works quiet well.
__________________ Kelly | 
08-28-2003, 03:01 PM
|  | Registered User Culinary Experience: Professional Chef | | Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Vermont, USA
Posts: 250
| | I too have clarified may consommes succesfuly without meat protein.
I feel one of the biggest no-no's mentioned in the original method was adding the clarafication ingredients to a hot broth. And if the simmer was quick that too could add to the problem. Also the length of time can affect things.
Jon |  | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |