Cook or Chef?

fairfieldchef · #1 01-01-2006, 05:35 PM

A question. Is there any guidelines or criteria for being called a chef as opposed to a cook. I know culinary trained professionals are called chefs but when or should cooks like myself (self trained or learning on the job) earn the title as chef? Or is it that cut and dried?

In the words of Rosa Anna Rosa Anna Danna "Nevermind", Ah, just saw a similar post and thread. Guess I should learn to search first, lol.

Andrew563 · #2 01-01-2006, 08:39 PM

From the old joke I heard...

Whats the difference between a cook and a chef?

The cook still has to clean up after himself.

chefATL · #3 01-01-2006, 09:15 PM

A cook is one who has basic knoledge and fundamentals of cooking. A Chef is the person that writes the menus, writes recipes, costs menus and recipes, does the scheduling, controls labor costs, controls food costs, Orders the product, inventories, Hires, fires, teaches, disciplines, and a myriad of other job functions. You don't have to go to school to be a chef. You'll know when you are ready and when you have EARNED the title. Hard work, patience, discipline , and perserverence. From the time you start cooking in a good kitchen it takes 4-5 years to work your way up to sous chef.

Pete · #4 01-01-2006, 11:48 PM

Fairfieldchef, do a search on the topic, here on CT. There are numerous threads regarding this very topic. There seem to be quite a few, strong opinions about this subject. Makes for some very interesting reading and some great insights.

fairfieldchef · #5 01-02-2006, 11:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Andrew563

From the old joke I heard...

Whats the difference between a cook and a chef?

The cook still has to clean up after himself.

Well, in that case I guess I'm a cook! LOL

Thanks to all for the replies and I'll remember to do a search before I ask my next question. I did find a lot of interesting post about chef vs cook.

Thanks again!

Laprise · #6 01-10-2006, 01:22 PM

If you wanted to simple explaination...

You can't be called a chef unless you hire or fire, manage cooks, and the BUCK stop at your desk...

We would like to think that you need CHEF PAPERS, but many cooks come out of culinary school calling themselves chefs...

But in reality, you should work a fair bit of time to really deserve the title of CHEF...

fairfieldchef · #7 01-10-2006, 11:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laprise

If you wanted to simple explaination...

You can't be called a chef unless you hire or fire, manage cooks, and the BUCK stop at your desk...

Well, then maybe I'm a Chef, because I just fired one and hired one!

Really, I consider myself a cook on the road to becoming, I hope, a chef.

coolJ · #8 01-11-2006, 06:43 PM

I've always said I'm just a cook, but responsibilities at work have moved me into a chef de partie position. So don't really know where that puts me, all I know is I'm not the executive or the sous. although I have been given the reigns for the odd banquet here and there.

canff · #9 12-18-2007, 06:42 PM

i would like to say it takes a lot of years of exp to be called a chef but i know some people who have worked as cooks for 12 years... and never made the jump... Some people just don't have the skills,,, ya they can cook but you need to be able to teach and lead, And paper work helps to... and have an over all good set of skills.. I have seen people who are just cooks, out work and skill a chef... its just a name on a paper, its how you act and work that gives you the right to be called a chef...

shel · #10 12-19-2007, 11:51 AM

So, where does the Chef de Cuisine fit in to all this?

shel

jigz369 · #11 12-19-2007, 04:07 PM

I had always heard that when the people we refer to as "chef" start to call us "chef", we have earned the title. And to the recent culinary graduate, you haven't earned the title so please stop referring to yourself as chef.
Just my opinion though....

Just Jim · #12 12-19-2007, 04:50 PM

I am a cook by trade, a chef by title and responsibility.

wonderwoman · #13 12-22-2007, 11:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chefATL

A cook is one who has basic knoledge and fundamentals of cooking. A Chef is the person that writes the menus, writes recipes, costs menus and recipes, does the scheduling, controls labor costs, controls food costs, Orders the product, inventories, Hires, fires, teaches, disciplines, and a myriad of other job functions. You don't have to go to school to be a chef. You'll know when you are ready and when you have EARNED the title. Hard work, patience, discipline , and perserverence. From the time you start cooking in a good kitchen it takes 4-5 years to work your way up to sous chef.

Now i know....thanks for the info. this was my question after i graduated Hotel and Restaurant Manaement Degree...LOL i asked it after i graduate hehehe!

ChefBoyofDees · #14 12-23-2007, 07:40 PM

Let me explain. I was trained in Omaha in the 80s and have been a line cook. However, I could not be given "a secret ingredient" and come up with 5 different recipes. I think that the test which separates the "cook" from the "chef" (besides some of the others input) is when you can walk into a kitchen...be shown 1 or 2 or 3 items...and prepare a eye appealing, mouth watering meal which is more than just SOS. In other words, I could be given tube pasta, cheese, milk and come up with an excellent Mac N Cheese. However, a CHEF could take those SAME ingredients and make something completely out of the box (nothing that would be obvious) and it would taste great (in most cases), look fabulous and make you "sit up and go Howdy!"

I hope this gets my point across as to when you are called a Chef or a cook. Based upon THIS criteria, I'm a great cook but NOT a Chef by any means.

jessiquina · #15 12-25-2007, 10:47 PM

a few people i work with are well, lets just say "the smartest kids on the short bus" and are giving sous or pastry chef positions. its sad really. they call themselves "chefs" but will have a rude awakening working at anyother job.