![]() | ||
| Cooking Articles • Cookbook Reviews • Cooking Forums • Recipes • Cooking Glossary |
|
Welcome to the ChefTalk Cooking Forums forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
| |||||||
| Register | Blogs | Photo Gallery | FAQ | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Food & Cooking Questions and Discussion Got a cooking question or something you want to discuss about food and cooking? This is the forum for you. Talk about anything related to food & cooking. |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| I made beef stock from bone, did all the proper skimming and added the proper ingredients. After the stock cooled it turned into jello, which i was told is a good sign. I am currently making French Onion soup, and after re-heating the stock, and adding all my ingredients, the stock tastes watery. Help please!! Am i doing something wrong?? |
| Sponsored links |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| It is kind of hard to imagine what you're doing, but the way I make French Onion Soup, is to first melt some clarified butter in a heavy pot, and carmelize about 7 cups of Vadalia or sweet onion that have been sliced. Once they've sweated and are turning slightly brown I had some finely diced garlic (not too much), and continue to brown. Then I add about 1 tsp of sugar to help the carmelization along. Before they start turning black or anything, I deglaze the pan with some red wine, like Burgundy, about 1/2 cup or so. I continue heating until most of the wine is no longer liquidy. Then I add a bay leaf, some fresh chopped thyme, and a little S&P. Stir that up good, and then I add the stock. I continue to simmer the stock, and finish with a couple of egg yolks (Stir the egg yolks in a small dish, add a ladle of hot stock, stir again, and then add to the pot) along with some Cognac. Then I finalize the S&P until it tastes just right. So, in essence the stock is the last thing I put in the pot, not one of the first. doc |
|
#3
| ||||
| ||||
| Now that you have your good beef jello, without a little salt, or more reduction, it will be a little watery. I salt my stock with beef base, the basic commercial kind. It may be cheating, but it works well. When I have time, I make my French onion soup with equals amount of Beef, Pork, and Veal bones. I rub them lightly with watery tomato paste, then give them a good roasting in the oven. When that is done, I boil and skim just like you have already done. This makes the best French Onion Soup Stock I've ever had. Oh, and don't forget the trinity (Carrot, Onion & celery) As for the onion, I never use sugar, instead I cook the sliced onions in a covered pot on VERY low heat for many hours, usually about eight. Toss the stock and the onions together, and you've got a great soup.
__________________ Will work for a bed and shower... I want to find a place to live that isn't Vermont. I am interested in seeing a few sites. |
|
#4
| ||||
| ||||
| The short answer is: no, you're not doing anything wrong. But you might have neglected to do one thing that would have told you if the flavor was strong enough. The next time you make stock, be sure to taste it before you chill it! That way you'll know if it needs to be cooked down more to concentrate the flavor. Flavor is a different aspect from gelling power, which sounds fine in your case. It's possible to make a stock that will gel really well, but not have much flavor. But it's easily fixed by just boiling down -- concentrating -- the stock.And if you really want to get crazy, look for the thread here on maximum collagen extraction. We had quite a debate about that a while ago. ![]()
__________________ Co-Moderator, Cooking Questions "Notorious stickler" -- The New York Times, January 4, 2004 |
|
#5
| ||||
| ||||
| You may want to use some meaty bones to make your stock, and when you taste stock, taste it plain first, then taste it with some salt.
__________________ Save a Life. Sign up to be a Marrow Donor Today |
|
#6
| ||||
| ||||
| Deltadoc...I'll be trying that recipe...thanks How much stock do you use for the 7 cups of Vadalia's?thanks, dan
__________________ I'm not a chef! So please take any advice I give with a grain of salt (it'll taste better) |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| Quote:
As far as tasting your stock, I don't find that really necessary unless you're looking to reduce it for other reasons. In particular I never salt the stock, and the only pepper I use is whole pepper in a Bouquet Garni or Sachet d'spice while making the stock. One should always S&P the sauce that the stock is being used in. That way your stock remains universally acceptable for any use you might want to put it to. (Try making rice with stock instead of water!) For flavoring reasons, I just do a "Glace de Viande" which is a 90% reduction of basic brown stock, done slowly. You will get a very rubbery product but a teaspoon or TBSP of that will do wonders for any sauce base that you find appropriate. For help in doing stocks, I take my wooden spoons, and I file really good "notches" on them. One notch for 18 Qt, a notch for 6 qts., one for 3 and one for 1/2 Qt. That way, I know how much I have reduced my stocks, or how much water to add initially (18Qts.). doc |
|
#8
| ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
__________________ Moderator, Welcome Forum ***It is better to ask forgiveness than beg permission.*** |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| When making stock I remember one piece of advice that my instructor told me in class one day: (she was discussing chicken stock this day) "If you taste stock, it should taste like a chicken ran through it. You don't want it to be like soup, just a slight amount of the title flavor in it." |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
| Well that chicken running through it comment got me thinking of Minor's Chicken Soup Base I been playing around with here lately. Swear that stuff taste like it got chicken feathers in it. Will make a person highly gassy and aromatic of dead chickens. Now do that be good or bad? Thanks. bigwheel Quote:
|
|
#11
| |||
| |||
| Beef stock needs a surprisingly large amount of beef to give it a true beefy flavor. Bones provide the basic body (the gelatin that's thickening the stock), but you really need meat. Some writers argue that you need as much as six pounds of something like beef shanks to make just two quarts of a rich stock. Aromatic vegetables can make up for some of the beef if you're wiling to settle for a stock with strong vegetative undertones. As mentioned in early posts, a bit of high quality beef base can also pump up the flavor, but too much gives that distinctly "bullion cube" taste. Another trick is to substitute some chicken parts for the beef (backs, necks, and wingtips are cheap and do fine). Chicken produces a much stronger flavored broth than beef, and as long as you don't overdo can provide a meaty base on which to build the beef flavor. (Remember, chicken flavors are strong.) In part this is because chicken fat tastes like chicken, but beef fat (tallow) doesn't taste like much at all. A little bit of red wine can also act as a flavor enhancer. Last edited by JonK : 05-30-2006 at 12:49 PM. |
|
#12
| |||
| |||
| I know this is a stupid question, but um...did you roast the bones before you used them in the stock? |
|
#13
| |||
| |||
| Not a stupid question at all. For a brown beef stock, which is what most recipes want, you should brown the meaty bones in a 450 degree F oven for 30 to 40 minutes. Toss in some of the aromatic veggies as well. After you remove the bones, get rid of the fat, but remember to then deglaze the pan with water or a little wine. Another technique favored by some cooks is to brown the beef bones right in the stock pan, using a bit of oil. Then degrease and deglaze. Some people also follow this up by then sweating the meat for about 20 minutes over low heat whereupon you'll usually find that some nice brown juices are released. Then go ahead with making the stock in the same pan. Depending on your use, you may want to clarify the stock with egg white. My dear departed mother, with the admirable frugality that characterized those of middle European origin, used to make a kind of boiled beef dinner not dissimilar to its New England namesake. In those cases, she did not brown the meat, but we could depend on the broth from the boil appearing the next day as a soup--light colored and clear, usually served with added vegetables, noodles, and--I've never been able to reproduce these--tasty liver dumplings. Served with bread, it was a whole meal, and even the family's liver haters loved it. (Me--I love liver.) This broth lacked the strong, beefy flavors of the roasted meat recipes, but was quite nice in its own right. |
|
#14
| ||||
| ||||
| I don't think there is more interesting discussion than stocks and broths. My basic understanding is that stock was prepared mainly from roasted bones, and broth was made mainly from simmered meat. I may be right or left on this. Now Jonk tells us his mother used beef water for soup. What a waste otherwise. Wonderous, practical, yum. I have read on another site of using the corned beef poaching liquid for day after soup. I had tipped it before then, what a fool am I? It always seemed such a shame. And it was. Since I cannot leave anything alone, the ideas of intro'ed mirepoix and veg in general quite makes my soul sing. Roasted as well. And the addition of some sort of high flavoured meat, you know, the cheap cuts, could only make things better. Maybe we should call it stoth. Mrs Beeton, (my book is 1900) advises to stir the scum back into a beef tea or soup base because that is where the protein is. I always had heaved carrot and whathaveyou in, which I thought incorrect, which is PDS, since a stock is what you make it of. |
|
#15
| ||||
| ||||
| I don't think there is more interesting discussion than stocks and broths. My basic understanding is that stock was prepared mainly from roasted bones, and broth was made mainly from simmered meat. I may be right or left on this. Now Jonk tells us his mother used beef water for soup. What a waste otherwise. Wonderous, practical, yum. I have read on another site of using the corned beef poaching liquid for day after soup. I had tipped it before then, what a fool am I? It always seemed such a shame. And it was. Since I cannot leave anything alone, the ideas of intro'ed mirepoix and veg in general quite makes my soul sing. Roasted as well. And the addition of some sort of high flavoured meat, you know, the cheap cuts, could only make things better. Maybe we should call it stoth. Mrs Beeton, (my book is 1900) advises to stir the scum back into a beef tea or soup base because that is where the protein is. I always had heaved carrot and whathaveyou in, and thought it wrong, which is PDS, since a stock is what you make it of. |
| Sponsored links |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Beef Stock | gbhunter | Food & Cooking Questions and Discussion | 7 | 11-26-2006 07:43 AM |
| Beef Stock | gbhunter | Food & Cooking Questions and Discussion | 24 | 11-01-2005 01:24 PM |
| Which cut of beef for "roast beef" cold cuts? | justfryit | Food & Cooking Questions and Discussion | 6 | 02-17-2005 04:11 AM |
| 2 subjects: Wine for cooking/Beef and Chicken Stock | Cat915 | Food & Cooking Questions and Discussion | 7 | 12-18-2004 07:09 AM |
| brown stock & fish stock | mmharrin | Food & Cooking Questions and Discussion | 12 | 10-09-2000 08:03 AM |