Yes, Dagger, your suspicions are on the money. About the only thing that works okay with splenda is cheesecake, and even that is not as good as what can be achieved with other sweeteners, especially those that provide sugary texture.
Sugar isn't just vital for sweetness, it's essential for texture. Without the right sugary texture, cakes don't rise correctly, aren't moist, cookies aren't crunchy/gooey/cohesive, etc. etc. Sugary texture means everything in baking. Splenda only provides sweetness, not texture. If you check the splenda website, they talk about this quite a bit. Their solution? Using "splenda for baking" a 50/50 sugar/splenda blend. For those of us that need to drastically cut sugar from our diet, the blend is not an acceptable compromise.
Sugar alcohols can provide sugary texture to baked goods, but they can also be laxating and spike blood sugar. If chosen carefully and used discriminately, they can be extremely low glycemic and gut friendly. Other than sugar alcohols, polymerized sugars such as polydextrose and inulin are excellent for mirroring the texture of sugar with very little glycemic response. Beyond sugar alcohols and polydextrose/inulin, there aren't many ingredients that mirror the texture of sugar. Soluble fiber gums can have a slightly sugar-like texture in some applications. The best for this purpose is acacia. Expert foods sells a baking aid called Thickenthin Notsugar that's acacia based.
Prunes are dried fruit. Dried fruit is a concentrated form of sugar. By adding dried fruit, the author is 'slipping' sugar into the recipe unbeknownst to most readers. It's a shell game- removing one form of sugar that people know is bad and replacing it with one that people don't immediately recognize.
Last edited by scott123; 09-24-2006 at 09:56 PM.
|