![]() | ||
| Cooking Articles • Cookbook Reviews • Cooking Forums • Recipes • Cooking Glossary |
|
Welcome to the ChefTalk Cooking Forums forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
| |||||||
| Register | Blogs | Photo Gallery | FAQ | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Pastries and Baking General General discussion forum for all pastry and baking topics. |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| I found an old article clipped from a magazine circa 1932 tucked into my great-great grandmother's notebook of recipes. In the article was a recipe for Peanut Butter Bread. It called for 6 tsp of Baking powder! I knew it was way too much when I read the recipe, but followed it anyway. Of course it came out with a horrible Baking Powder after taste and cracked on top. Other than that I think it would have tasted pretty good! How much Baking Powder should I use instead? And why on earth would it call for so much Baking Powder in the first place? Was it a typo or was Baking Powder just less effective back in he 30's that they needed to use more? Here is the list of ingredients for anyone that has any insight. Thanks! 3 C Flour 1/2 C Sugar 1 1/2 tsp salt 6 tsp Baking Powder 1/2 C Peanut Butter 1 Egg 1 1/2 C Milk 3 TBSP Melted Butter. |
| Sponsored links |
| |
|
#2
| ||||
| ||||
| teaspoons would suffice. perhaps back in 1932 the baking powder was not as strong as it is today. ![]()
__________________ bake first, ask questions later. http://www.myspace.com/chefmbrown Professor Culinary and Pastry Arts www.CCCCD.edu |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| M Brown is right. In your great- grandmothers day the baking powder was only single action. Thats probably why her recipe called for 6 tsps.. Now all baking powder you purchase in the shops is double action.. The general rule of thumb I've learned to go by is 1 to 1 1/4 tsp. baking powder to each cup of flour.. |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| Depends which country you come from.... Most of Australian manufacturers allows 2 teaspoons baking powder [equivalent to "double action"] per AU metric cup of flour [5 oz plain all purpose flour]. This also the recommended substitute for self-raising[rising] flour. . |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| Wow that is alot! |
| Sponsored links |
| |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Baking Powder VS. Baking Soda... | MacMorrighan | Pastries and Baking General | 2 | 12-09-2006 12:03 PM |
| Baking Powder Vs. Baking Soda in Cookies | PastryGirl111 | Pastries and Baking General | 10 | 02-08-2005 12:52 PM |
| Baking powder! | marito | Food & Cooking Questions and Discussion | 7 | 11-15-2003 10:19 PM |
| Baking soda or baking powder in cookies? | angrychef | Pastries and Baking General | 16 | 03-11-2002 04:28 PM |
| Baking Powder | Isa | Pastries and Baking General | 4 | 03-06-2001 12:33 PM |