Go To ChefTalk.com
    Cooking ArticlesCookbook ReviewsCooking ForumsRecipesCooking Glossary  

Welcome to the ChefTalk Cooking Forums forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

Go Back   ChefTalk Cooking Forums > Food and Cooking Forums > Pastries and Baking General
Register Blogs Photo Gallery FAQ Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Pastries and Baking General General discussion forum for all pastry and baking topics.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 09-20-2001, 01:11 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Seattle
Posts: 435
angrychef is on a distinguished road
Wink higher % cocoa solids in chocolate

I always use a chocolate with a minimum of 56-60% cocoa solids. A ganache made with equal proportions of this chocolate plus manufacturing cream comes out with the perfect glazing consistency. I recently tried a chocolate with 70%(i think) cocoa solids. I did my usual ganache recipe and it is way too viscous, I had to increase my proportion of cream and it turned out great. Also in its melted state it is too thick for dipping. My question is: when using a chocolate with a higher cocoa solids %, does one need to add a bit more cocoa butter to thin it out? Can you use oil? And is it more viscous because it has less sugar or less fat?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
Foodservicesingles.com
  #2  
Old 09-20-2001, 03:04 PM
Kimmie's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Montreal, Quebec, CANADA
Posts: 2,831
Kimmie is on a distinguished road
No Smile

I'm no pro but I've used butter many times, maybe a bit more cream too. Seems to do the trick!

__________________
K

«Money talks. Chocolate sings. Beautifully.»
«Just Give Me Chocolate and Nobody Gets Hurt.»
«Coffee, Chocolate, Men ... Some things are just better rich.»
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-20-2001, 06:33 PM
shroomgirl's Avatar
Registered User
Culinary Experience: Professional Caterer
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: St. Louis Mo
Posts: 5,515
shroomgirl is on a distinguished road
Post

My chocolate of preference is Valharona 70%....love it as flourless chocolate cake with ganauche.
__________________
cooking with all your senses.....
http://www.chanterellecatering.net
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-21-2001, 02:55 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 1,756
W.DeBord is on a distinguished road
Post

I know what you mean. I prefer not to work with 70% myself. It just slowed me down adjusting. Truthfully I never found any real advantage to using it? The only places I can think of where it would be an advantage is in cookies with big choc. chunks or truffles and other candies....?

Just a guess, but it makes more sense to me that it's less fat, not less sugar. Its sweetness is the same as similar chocolates... it would have to be less cocoa butter which wouldn't affect the taste only the thickness in my opinion. Shortening or oil both work to thin. I've used oil in mousses and bavarians and gotten nice results. I never had cocoa butter available due to it's cost and availablity.
__________________
"Bakers are born, not made. We are exacting people who delight in submitting ourselves to rules and formulas if it means achieving repeatable perfection", Rose Levy Beranbaum
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-21-2001, 01:23 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Seattle
Posts: 435
angrychef is on a distinguished road
Post

The distributor told me it was the sugar content that affected its viscosity, but I totally agree with you Wendy -- it is the fat content that gives it its fluidity. The more bitter the chocolate is, the lower its sugar content.I've always used Callebaut #811(i think it has 56% solids), so I've been interested in trying out their darker stuff. For what?--I still don't know. I'd be interested to see how others use such a chocolate, I mean in which specific applications.
shroomgirl --- I've tried Valrohna but it's a bit too expensive for the stuff we make. In your experience, when would you use a 70% chocolate as opposed to a 60% chocolate?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-02-2001, 12:42 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 258
monpetitchoux is on a distinguished road
Post

Doesn't it depend on what you are making? One of the things I remember most about cooking school was the chocolate tasting (11 dark chocolates). We had to assess each for sweetness, fruitiness, etc. Some chocolates taste more fruity, some have more acidity, some have more roasted bean flavor, it varies with the maker. I'm pretty lucky to be able to use valrhona in my work. Most of the time we use Manjari (64%) for our desserts because it has great fruitiness and edgy acidity. But for our cinnamon chocolate mousse, we use Caraibe (66%) because it's fruitness is subdued, meaning we can taste the chocolate more and it allows the cinnamon to compliment rather than compete with the chocolate. We had some Callebaut left over from the previous pastry chef, so we used it in our chocolate ice cream. When I was given a piece to taste, I have to say that the Callebaut seemed to be boasting it's roasted character. It had controlled acidity and I couldn't taste much fruitiness. It made pretty good ice cream.

I also agree that it's the cocoa butter that affects goopiness when melted. But I also think that it has much to do with the conching process. Callebaut, scarffenberger are both superconched. You can tell when you put a piece of it under your tongue and it takes forever to melt and mingle with your saliva. But Callebaut is much more goopy when melted than Valrhona. At another restaurant I worked at, we used michel Cluizel for something (I can't remember), but that melted super thin. To thin, we usually use either cocoa butter or butter depending again on what we use it for. Cocoa butter for chocolate candy fillings and butter for pastries.

Shroomgirl, you are a serious chocolate connosieur! I can barely eat Valrhona 70% (I think it's Guanaya) straight or mousses made with it. And it was tough to work with. We had to add butter to liquify that one a bit.
__________________
SmartGirl to the rescue!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links
Foodservicesingles.com
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:58 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0
© 1998 - 2006 ChefTalk.com • All rights reservedAd Management by RedTyger

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117