Professional Chefs Forum Discuss with other professional chefs the latest trends, kitchen and employee issues and more.


Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 05-05-2005, 07:21 AM
kuan's Avatar
kuan Offline
ChefTalk Moderator
Culinary Experience: Retired Chef
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 4,137
Default Metric PLEASE!

Everybody, if I promise to write all my recipes in metric will you do the same? In your kitchen, in your house?

Please?
Reply With Quote


  #2  
Old 05-05-2005, 09:04 AM
Botanique's Avatar
Botanique Offline
ChefTalk Book Reviewer
Culinary Experience: Other
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Walnut Grove, CA
Posts: 431
Default

LOL I feel your pain. Are you starting a Chelf Talk metric movement? I'll back you ;-)
__________________
Life is a banquet, and most poor suckers are starving to death! Auntie Mame
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-05-2005, 11:27 AM
Nicholas Offline
Registered User
Culinary Experience: Line Cook
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Singapore
Posts: 107
Default

I'm with you. Metric is definitely the way to go.
It's a waste of time having to convert recipes from volume to metric!
I'm glad we use metric in Singapore, hooray for that.
__________________
____________________________________
Around The World In 40 Winks
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-05-2005, 01:11 PM
Frizbee's Avatar
Frizbee Offline
Registered User
Culinary Experience: Restaurant Manager
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Jacksonville, NC
Posts: 168
Default But why.....

I am just stuck in old school I guess. My brain hurts when I have to think about metric, however I am wondering why the interest in changing?
Frizbee
-sometimes disgruntal about change....
__________________
Do what you do with passion....the rest will fall into place
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-05-2005, 06:25 PM
panini's Avatar
panini Offline
Registered User
Culinary Experience: Owner/Operator
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,104
Default

WHY????
The united Stated threatened to go metric years ago.LOL The legeslators couldn't understand it LOL
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-05-2005, 06:54 PM
KeeperOfTheGood's Avatar
KeeperOfTheGood Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 279
Default

LOL



I am a CANADIEN!!!!!!

I am BI-SYSTEMATICAL


Personally, I far prefer the use of cups and pounds over millilitres and grams.

I know my fist is a cup, my cupped hand is a teaspoon shallow and a tablespoon deep, that two fists is a pound and that 8 eggs is a cup.

I have no idea what 10 eggs would be, other than to many...

Also, metric temp divisions are not clean. 350 F, 400 F, nice, clean numbers that have very predictable results that work. I have no idea the centigrade on any of that.


Now, if I was doing chemistry or physics or electronics, its metric all the way.




But with cooking, the most complicated electronics there is is the on switch, the most involved physics is that sudden motions cause souffles to fall, and the most complex chemistry is that to four fists of flour I add two deep handfuls of baking powder and one shallow hand of salt a fist to four fists of liquid and viola.... quick bread to corn bread to pour batter
__________________
Space...the final frontier. These are the voyages of KeeperOfTheGood. His lifetime mission: to explore strange new worlds of flavour, to seek out new life and and ways of cooking it- to boldly grill where no man has grilled before.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-09-2005, 06:33 PM
Chef_Bob's Avatar
Chef_Bob Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 98
Thumbs up

I too am Canadian and use both systems. I can only tell you how warm it is out side in metric (24 today! Woo hoo Summer! ) but I can only cook in imperial ( I think I need to calibrate my dep fryer again, which only has imperial markings on it). I drive 88 kilometers to work every day but my stairs are 4 feet wide at home. I have no idea how many kilograms I weigh (and am in denial as to how many pounds ) but I buy my deli meat in grams. So really has Canada gone metric, ya sure, and we are all bilingual, say "eh" and live in igloos! I guess it is a Canadian thing to not want to offend the old system, so even though the laws have changed the people have not.
__________________
Chef Bob


"Ask not what you can do for your country. Ask what's for lunch?" ~ Orsen Wells (1915-1985)


http://www.frappr.com/cheftalkcafe
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-19-2005, 01:56 PM
shahar Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Philadelphia, Pa
Posts: 225
Default

We should move to metric time -

100 second a minute, 100 minutes an hour and 20 hours a day.
that makes a metric second about 1/2 of current second.

It would probably never happen, but it would simplify everything. Right now you have a system with 100(milliseconds), 60(seconds, minutes) and 12/24 (hours). for calculations you have to switch three times. ahhrrrggghhh!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-07-2005, 12:49 PM
Chef_Bob's Avatar
Chef_Bob Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 98
Talking

Metric time! I love it!!!! Sign me up!
__________________
Chef Bob


"Ask not what you can do for your country. Ask what's for lunch?" ~ Orsen Wells (1915-1985)


http://www.frappr.com/cheftalkcafe
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-07-2005, 01:23 PM
phatch's Avatar
phatch Offline
ChefTalk Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: SLC UT
Posts: 3,069
Default

Vernor Vinge and Charlie Stross in their fiction have used computer/metric time: kiloseconds, megaseconds, gigaseconds and so on. It's not perfectly clear if those are the binary computer multiples or the metric multiples, but it's a VERY interesting idea in light of their singularity based fiction.

Stross is giving away his latest novel, Accelerando in an experiment. I was somewhat let down by the ending, but rather enjoyed the rest of the novel.

Phil
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 07-07-2005, 05:11 PM
chinds85 Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 40
Default

Most of the recipes I post are far more vague aproximations of amount than the US measurement system. I would prefer metric but sometimes I simply dont measure out ingredients. Like many, I'm more inclined to skim a recipe and "wing it" rather than follow it word for word.

Of course, that does not apply to all food I cook.
__________________
Chris Hinds
Chef, Blue Door Cafe'
Culinary School Prospective
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 07-07-2005, 07:51 PM
panini's Avatar
panini Offline
Registered User
Culinary Experience: Owner/Operator
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,104
Default

My son and I are just finishing up his first Jensen Healey. The only tools I take care of are the metrics. Losing the standards keeps me from doing things around the house
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 07-07-2005, 11:15 PM
Fincher Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ottawa Ontario
Posts: 13
Default

I'm an American living in Canada, so I'm having to adjust to the bi-system

steaks cut in oz..

small measures are imperical, teaspoon, cup etc, but anything larger goes to liters not gallons

oven is in imperical, fridges are monitered in imperical, the heat in the kitchen in metric

shots at the bar are in oz. but wine (of course) is metric

if the floor drain backs up, the water is measured in inches, not centimeters

etc.. etc.. its confusing! I'm used to only imperical, metric would be fine, but using both seems challenging
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 07-08-2005, 03:47 AM
Mikeb's Avatar
Mikeb Offline
Registered User
Culinary Experience: Professional Chef
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 318
Default

I only use metric unless a recipe calls for imperial. I also only measure things by weight, never by volume (more precise by weight). If a recipe calls for volume/imperial mesurements I just guess/estimate since I'm too lazy to convert. No ones noticed yet...
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 07-09-2005, 04:08 PM
shahar Offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Philadelphia, Pa
Posts: 225
Default

The one great thing about metric, one that many americans don't understand, is that with that system recipes are actually ratios. They can be instantly changed.

Like let's say I have a recipe that give me fifty 40 gram buns. Tomorrow I need a hundred and fifty 60 gram buns. I multiply the original recipe by 3(1.5x2). In ten - twenty(if you're really slllloooowww) seconds, you get the new recipe.

Most of my recipes, if they need precision(I don't weight tomatos for salsa), call for ratio alone:

1 flour
2 liquid
0.25 egg yolks
etc.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off