Professional Chefs Forum Discuss with other professional chefs the latest trends, kitchen and employee issues and more.


Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 10-30-2007, 11:10 AM
fishmonger Offline
Registered User
Culinary Experience: Professional Chef
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1
Default Ethics?????????

Hi Everyone,

This is my 1st post on this board and sorry for it being of a controversial nature but I'm seeing something that really bothers me. I started a new thread so everyone would see it and not get lost in the shuffle.

Why would anyone advocate not eating red meat, pork and poultry? Then in the same breath say they don't mind eating fish and shellfish.

Red meat, pork, and poultry are a sustainable resource. Lets face the fact that these animals were not just a result of "nature". They most likely are a result of artificial insemenation in order to produce food for us human beings. In other words they were born to feed us.

Fish and shellfish on the other hand are an entirely different story. By saying you only eat fish and shellfish is like saying you will support the demise of the worlds oceans.

How many of you eat grouper or snapper or shrimp? Well guess what, the shrimp fishery is causing serious damage to grouper and snapper stocks as well as their habitat caused by dredging. Did anyone see the episode of dirty jobs where Mike Rowe worked on a shrimp boat? If so did you see all the "cull"? Cull is another name for bycatch and they were mostly juvenile fish. If anyone knows about gill nets knows that fish that are gilled usually don't survive as there is severe damage done by the nets.

How about those of you that consume tuna and swordfish. You guessed it not good again. These fish are taken by longliners. Miles upon miles of indescriminate hooks. While they are meant to to target tuna and swordfish they also take other species like white and blue marlin. Guess what the white marlin stocks are depleted to the point that are now listed as "threatened" bordering on endangered. Not because of sportfisherman that kill less than 30 a year on the East Coast of the US but by the commercial longliners that cull them as undesireable.

Lets talk about tuna swordfish now. Up until a few years ago the swordfish stock were severly depleted in the North East and in Florida. Through conservation efforts the stock has made a comeback but hasn't fully recovered.

Giant Bluefin Tuna are nearly decimated. The money that they fetch in the Japenese market is unreal. We are talking tens of thousands of dollars for ONE fish. This makes them very attractive for commercial fisherman and intern puts a tremndous amount of pressure on the stocks. Yet organizations like ICCAT (google it) who claim they are trying to fix this problem have done nothing but contribute to it.......

Don't get me started on the oyster harvesters or crab scrapes in the Chesepeake Bay............

What is more important to you? The feelings of a cow standing in line at the slaughter house or the global ecology of the worlds oceans.

I'm not a Vegetarian. I eat meat, fish, shellfish and everything in between. But when people make statements like "I only eat fish" it drives me nuts. They try to fill the world with their smug when they are just showing their true ignorance.

Thanks for reading,

Joe

C.E.C.
Reply With Quote


  #2  
Old 11-04-2007, 11:25 AM
YoungGun Offline
Registered User
Culinary Experience: Sous Chef
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 26
Default

Joe,

I suppose I can safely assume that your post is a derivative of my original one, Meat and Ethics. Perhaps I am wrong. Either way, the reason I have an "easier" time eating fish and seafood is because I live in British Columbia, where sea food is very abundant, and I refuse to eat anything but wild caught fish. This sort of lines up with my desire to eat game meats as opposed to, say, a cow that has been raised in a factory farming operation. Simiarly, I eat free range eggs, organic milk, etc. I try to buy local, and from farmers that I know are reputable. I'm not a saint, nor is anyone else in the world. I too find the "holier than thou" approach annyoing in any respect. But it makes it easier for me to sleep at night knowing I have not contributed to poor treatment of animals. And even if it has to die, so do I, leading to my next point...

Something very insightful that was said in my thread was that basically, no animal will show you the consideration not to kill you in the wild if it can. I believe in eating animals that are given a fair chance, ie: hunted. I eat red meat maybe twice a year. Sometimes I cave and eat a buffalo burger. More than ethics and the blah blah blah we get caught up in, I do it because I like to feel like as close to an animal as I can get, because we are animals, and because that's real to me.

Last edited by YoungGun; 11-04-2007 at 04:43 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-07-2007, 07:31 AM
ldzpapa Offline
Registered User
Culinary Experience: Professional Chef
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 42
Default

Once again I have the same response that I have to so many threads, know your suppliers, insist on sustainable practices, you are the one spending the money they will listen if you give ultimatums and if they don't, there is someone out there who will.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Meat and Ethics YoungGun Professional Chefs Forum 36 10-25-2007 08:51 AM
Question on Ethics morffin Professional Chefs Forum 14 02-11-2007 12:09 PM
Ethics: A complicated sauce. Rivitman Professional Chefs Forum 43 12-03-2006 09:46 PM
Ethics in Job Hunting isaac Professional Chefs Forum 9 05-08-2004 02:41 PM
Ethics of Foie Gras? foodnfoto The Late Night Cafe (non-food/cooking discussion) 14 09-04-2001 11:59 PM