New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Terminologies of Cuts - Page 2

post #31 of 53
GodfatherChef
"i have the utmost respect for everybody in this forum who shows respect for everybody else. there is no reason that we should get upset and disrespect each other. thats not what being a chef is all about, at least not to me. i have been through many things in my short life thus far that have humbled far beyond anything that i can imagine. i have had to go through 2 divorces, the suicide of my mother, and most recently, i am starting to recover from cancer. this should have all made me a very bitter person, but it's only made me want to enjoy my life that much more. "

Thank You, You just knocked me off my ladder and as I hit the ground, my ears are ringing.
Your GD right. There is so much more important things in life.I usually don't slip back. As time goes by, sometimes we forget! I wish you a speedy recovery. It's all about attitude, my friend. You'll be fine. I'm 12 years out and my wife is six years out from cancer and transplants. So we shall stay conected, ok?
Jeff
post #32 of 53
thank you, pan
i appreciate it very much. i wish the best to you and your wife.
we shall keep in touch indeed
post #33 of 53
To the post prior,
I would be very careful not to make assumptions. Only
a few connected people within this forum know anything
about the families and past of others. I think it might
be wrong to assume anyone is from a priviliged backround.
No one can know what sacrifices each of us made to get
where we are today. I, for one, don't speak much about
my sacrifices, because they are mine!!! True, we can not
all be the same, as if cut out from cookie cutters, but a
big part of what we do depends on doing things the same.
I often look at cooking as a language. Written and spoken.
There does exist a little room for personal interpretation when speaking, but,
the word must be written the same every time for the language to be
successful. Sure, there are new words that show up in each
years dictionary, but, for the majority of the words, there
can be only one way to spell them. Okay, Okay, a little
hokey I admit. I am only saying that it is okay to take joy
in tradition and custom. Its nothing to be ashamed of. There
are absolutes. I am humbled by the fact that so many others
before me, even in death, offer me the tools to practice my trade.
At times I think the old style culture of cooking will probably die out,
although I hope not. Often I wonder what it would be like if this
computor melted away and we were all standing in front of each other,
or if we were working together. Am I that sure of myself? I am.
Would I be up to muster compared to all the others at this post?
I don't know. But, this has been my trade for so long that it is
part of me. I feel more comfortable in whites and checks than in
normal clothes. Oh! I do ramble. Have a splendiferous morning!
post #34 of 53
Thread Starter 
Hi,

You must be very exhausted, exited and frustrated, why not you reading again what you wrote to me, as you are assuming.

I am not one of this spoiled once you refer too, I had the chance to grow up in nature, with animals, trees, berries and extremely hardworking and honest parents.

By the way when I was 10 I had 400 plus rabbits, that was my business. In summer I went to help farmers and before winter I went to the forest to replant trees.

I do respect nature the most and humanity second as they way you talk learn about nature and God first and thereafter start to cook with respect and believe and understanding. Well also try to understand the 14 cooking methods, so cooking any dishes in this world is just easier.

Regards
post #35 of 53
Thread Starter 
Dear Stephen,

Live is a ***** for many and they are desperate as something went wrong along the way. They just believe of what they learned once and believe that is the right thing. In essence they have no tolerance and an open mind, to accept new or old point of views.

What I posted here with the vegetable cuts, I can see it clearly, it is French language and the pity is most on this site are speaking only English. So they refuse it, French, so hard to learn and why - simply old stuff!

Well I do speak some languages 6 in all, if you as an English speaker, please at least have the right respect to foreign languages and don’t just spell them the way you feel or copy them from a badly translated book, or my better advice don’t use them. But fore sure I do understand a no French speaking person and its ego would use French sounding word to impress customers with their Alien sounding menu. Well no point here even to discuss French menu language as I see it often Pommes de terre + a name. Well just show!

Culinary arts has a history with very simple and clear principals, well what I understand today from many of the posts here, you are actually rediscovering them.

Well let’s be honest and clear in live and not arrogant or selfish. Let’s understand facts of history first, what brought us thru good and bad times and were we truly stand today within a country within a nation or the world.

TV chef in the US presently do educate Americans if you like it or not, they actually like Mario opens their eyes of simple Italian food. Well Italian food nobody has to discuss with me, it is so simple and clean. It is time that America discovers healthy eating again, drive a way form the fast food restaurant industry, with all the chemicals in the food to preserve them from the processing plant to the 40 plus outlets.

Well to all, that was my farewell text here, hope you enjoyed my culinary posts about the true history of our old chefs, who live in my heart everyday.

Regards

PS: for chefs who fell to stay in touch with me contact Stephen, as a chef you are not selfish and defiantly not arrogant as posted before . As a chef you are an ambassador of healthy food and not junk food.
post #36 of 53
One last reply.

I do not speak french and am a poor speller. I am also mostly from
rural Georgia. At times I can slaughter terms in french as any of you
can imagine. I do know a fare amount of the terms and use them
frequently. Thank a million Hans. Just having someone listen and take
the time to reply means the world to me. I could give a *&^%$ less
about how your posts came across. I could read between the lines.
I thought you were very eloquent, especially since this is not your first
lanquage. I am in awe of your accomplishments and very respectful of
where it has ultimately taken you. Hope to learn more from you in the
future. I may be a hillbilly, but, with a little help, I'll at least have a firm
grasp on the only trade I know. It was truly and honor.
The best to you and your family. "Don't let the door hit you,
where the good Lord split you. Will type at you later.

Respectfully,

Even Stephen
post #37 of 53
Thread Starter 
Stephen,

Well form me I now when to end and here I do end on this site, as I understand when people are to egocentric and not human mined (well just national mined). When people post and before posting don’t try to understand between the lines, well you will get into an argument.

Well as a chef the understanding in between the line is very important, as it happened many times to me as a Food and Beverage Director eventually in young age to understand the qualities of a shy and humble employee in between the lines and the Chef told me. He is a good kid, he just made a mistake. Well so we met over a beer and discussed on how to improve that young man or women. Well and trust Chefs are always accommodating to anybody with a future in live. Like your new assignment in Nepal.

regards

HS

But here i end it on this site and please respect as it takes humbly to much energy to explain basics to people who dont read between the lines, well so proud to discover cooking again. Well and well, do it the hard way!

but one thing i have to say, i was soo shy as a young boy. however as i was able with the blessing of my father and mother to become a cook, i lost it clearly to be shy. but still today i do always remember that i was shy. (read between the lines)
post #38 of 53

Mesopotamia (sp?)...Fast Food...Street Carts...

Romans...pizzarias....

Yeah...Mr. "History" needs to study more...

My FOURTEEN YEAR OLD DAUGHTER told me about these...

April
post #39 of 53
I'll be honest, I just finished culinary school and sometimes I have to stop and actively think what the dimensions are on various cut names. I know some basics that I use often:

small/medium/large dice, brunious (forgive my spelling), julienne, paysanne, rondelle, etc...

But for the most part I think that it's VERY MUCH a "use it or lose it" kind of knowledge. We remember what cuts we use most often, and forget about the stuff we don't ever use, or use on such a rare occasion we have to ask/look it up to verify whether or not we've forgotten it.

I can't remember how many times my chef instructor would walk by and have that look on her face like she wanted to slap me upside the head for having horrible knife skills. She actually had a few metal "cut guides" that we had to use if we screwed up. It was essentially a slab of metal with little cut-outs the size of what we were supposed to be cutting.

Like always though, I think it BEGINS with training, and CONCRETES itself with use. If you don't use it, you WILL forget it eventually. Some things just aren't "like riding a bike".
post #40 of 53
Obviously it helps in communication in any situation to have a universal language that everyone understands, this contributes to understanding and consistency on a universal level,,,, but at the same time as an employer you need to understand that not everyone will come form the same background. Or look at it in the sense of having over 85% of your staff non-english speaking people! Im trying to teach them english, and they are suppose to know french terminology? Not at this point in time, that would be unreasonable. I think a great chef would know the french names and terminology, and be able to teach this to a willing cook, but at the same time be able to adapt and understand that not everyone will know. As long as you can get the cuts you want from your staff, and they are of good quality and consistency, and as long as you can convey your thoughts and wants, have open lines of communication to your staff, then you could call the classic vegetable cuts whatever the **** you wanted to. Infact, I may just change the cut brunoise to "the squirrel cut"....
post #41 of 53
Think I said that, way back in the second or third page of this thread as well....
post #42 of 53
thats what I get for skipping a page *sigh* I was on my way to work and wanted to make my point before I was late. sorry mate:smoking:
post #43 of 53

good evening to all

post #44 of 53

Ancient thread, going back to 2006, if I remember correctly, and  alot of the posters no longer with us.

 

Why did you pick this one out of the dust?

post #45 of 53

so you can ask silly questions...obviously.  Hey pot2, welcome to cheftalk. 

post #46 of 53

what are the difference with stocks and mirepoix?

post #47 of 53

Wow does this bring back memories! I almost feel like looking up the good Chef Kaiser and starting this back up!

post #48 of 53

some exec chef's don't even know the correct terminology... frustrating because they ask you to do a cut and you do it right, but they meant a different cut. i would just demo it to clear up any confusion.

post #49 of 53


Originally Posted by Huy Bui View Post

some exec chef's don't even know the correct terminology... frustrating because they ask you to do a cut and you do it right, but they meant a different cut. i would just demo it to clear up any confusion.


Ahhh the assurance of youth. 

 

The truth is there is not complete consistency in size from kitchen to kitchen.  Not even in Paris.   

 

Alumette, baton and batonet are particularly hapahazard.  No joy there.

 

On the "good communication is good cooking" side, it's safe to assume julienne and brunoise are annoyingly small and that each tourne d'spuds classique gets seven sides -- but if you think you can get an exact definition in mm or inches that will survive crossing the street, Mais beinsur non. 

 

It's whatever the exec says it is.  It turns out (s)he actually knew all along.

 

BDL


Edited by boar_d_laze - 7/28/10 at 5:07pm
post #50 of 53

BDL, that may be true and whatever chef says goes, but those words have definitions... just because ignorance runs rampant among this profession does not mean we have to perpetuate it. if chef says up is down, then up is down... but that is obviously not true.

 

my point still stands, just demo it and call it whatever you like, then there will be no confusion.


Edited by Huy Bui - 7/28/10 at 8:38pm
post #51 of 53

Quote:

Originally Posted by pot2 View Post

what are the difference with stocks and mirepoix?


They are two completely different things. Mirepoix is 2 part Onions, 1 part Celery, and 1 part Carrots... a common aromatic flavoring ingrdient for french cuisine. 

 

A stock is made by simmering bones/ vegetables in water and aromatics. (sometimes including mirepoix) This is used for soups or flavoring foods.

post #52 of 53

Mirepoix is very often two parts onion, 1 part carrot and 1 part celery as Hui Buy said -- but by no means always.  Both the proportions and ingredients are subject to rather significant change.  Parsnips are often substituted for carrots, leeks for onions, celery omitted altogether, mushrooms added, a little bit of pork belly added (mirepoix gras), green peppers added, and so on. 

 

A couple of common variations are the creole/cajun trinity of celery, onions and peppers; Italian soffritto; and the Spanish/Latin-American sofrito of garlic, tomato and onions.

 

At its most basic mirepoix is a mix of chopped aromatics used to build a flavor base as part of a more complicated dish.  Sometimes it is strained out -- as with  stocks; and sometimes it's a featured garnish -- as in many poules.  

 

If you're going to strain it out, you can get away with rough cutting.  If it will be served as a garnish, it's usually cut in a medium dice.

 

BDL

post #53 of 53

All of the vegetable cuts I believe were to develop a sort of consistency in cooking.and prep.That no matter where you went Brunoise meant a certain way. I am 68 years old been in this business since I was 15. Worked in hi end and other places. Have worked in Europe in the Negresco Hotel in Nice and other places. Apprenticed at the Old Hotel Pierre and Astor in NYC.and no matter where it was the termonology  of cooking and prep was the same. The C.I.A. was a storefront in Connecticut run by a woman lawyer who also tried to teach consistency. It was all done for the sake of consistency which I believe is the key to a good restaurant . Escoffier and the rest of the European chefs fostered it and they handed it down to us. They taught us well.

 We in turn taught them . We taught them mass production and how to get it out. When I was in Europe it took 4 cooks to produce a dinner on the line, here 3 guys dish out 200 or more .

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Professional Chefs Forum