ChefTalk.com › ChefTalk Cooking Forums › Food and Cooking Forums › Cooking Equipment › 1 1/2 Quart Stainless Saucepan - Suggestions?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

1 1/2 Quart Stainless Saucepan - Suggestions?

post #1 of 8
Thread Starter 
Recently, on the recommendation of KYHeirloomer, I purchased a Simply Calphalon 1qt saucepan which has turned out to be quite a little workhorse. I must use it three or four times a week for anything from boiling water to reheating soup and making small quantities of veggie dishes.

I'd now like a slightly larger pot - 1.5 quarts. It must have a stainless interior and I'd like one with a see-through lid, although that's not a deal point. It would be real nice if it had a rolled edge for easier pouring. I don't want to spend a lot of money for it as it will get mostly light, but frequent, use. However, it must be of quality at least comparable to the Simply Calphalon pot. A heavy aluminum bottom woulld be fine, althoughh straught gauge dconstruction is also acceptable.

Suggestions?

Shel
post #2 of 8
I've got some stainless steel saucepans from Martha Stewarts line of of cookware, available at Kmart. They're inexpensive yet good quality for the price. Good heavy impact bonded aluminum base and glass lids. The edge is not rolled, but is well flared and pours decently. At their price point, you don't get all the bells and whistles. They've cooked everything I've thrown at them and I have no complaints.

I think they're worth checking out at least.

Phil
post #3 of 8
I'm sure I'll come under fire for this, Shel. But for the uses you discuss, you can't go wrong with WearEver. No kidding!

I have a 1 1/2 qt and a 2 qt that I bought years ago. And they've given surprisingly great service.

The handle design has a little to be desired. Essentially it's just a piece of rolled sheet stainless rivited to the pot. But for the pricepoint, and the amount I use them, I can live with it. Other than that, these pots offer all the features you listed.

We tend, on lists like this one, to fall into the "high cost is better" trap. But the fact is, less expensive stuff often fits the bill just the same.
post #4 of 8
Thread Starter 
I've not been able to find out much about Martha Stewart's pots, although I discovered the Cuisinart makes a pot that seems to fit the requirements, and they're (supposedly) available at Bed Bath and Beyond for $20.00. I'm going to look at them in a day or so, and in the mean time see about Wearever.

Yes, more expensive usually means better quality, but often we don't need a top quality item for a lightweight job. I've got my share of All Clad and Le Creuset, but they are overkill for boiling water, reheating a few veggies, and warming up a can of soup on a chilly evening.

Shel
post #5 of 8
Cuisinart rules! Feel lucky if you able to find one with copper disc on bottom, not sure if they still make it. Great heat distributon, easy to clean, handle construction(!)

Chef's catalog had them before.
post #6 of 8
Thread Starter 
I was not impressed with the Cuisinart pot upon first examination. It felt flimsy and cheap. However, I rarely allow first impressions to guide my decicions, so I'll be checking the pot once again. My inclination at this point is to go with a certain Calphalon model (Calphalon - Contemporary Stainless Basics - Sauce Pans) or another All-Clad. The All-Clad is pretty expensive for the intended use, but I know it'll give me good service. The Calphalon model is half the price, and looks/feels like it will also provide very good service.

Thanks for your comments,

Shel
post #7 of 8
for everyday use, I have found the Cuisinart line to be very satisfactory.
post #8 of 8
I don't think you can go wrong with All-Clad. But, I don't think you'll get the see-through lid or the rolled lip.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Cooking Equipment
ChefTalk.com › ChefTalk Cooking Forums › Food and Cooking Forums › Cooking Equipment › 1 1/2 Quart Stainless Saucepan - Suggestions?