Was just reading “Cuisine and Culture,” Linda Civitello’s book subtitled “a history of food and people.”
Frankly, it isn’t written very well. There are some serious historical and research errors in it. And it wouldn’t have suffered, any, by having a professional editor take a look. But her premise is interesting.
What Civitello maintains is that, because of the continual movement of peoples, and the melding of cultures, all cuisines consist of fusion foods, and the very idea of fusion being new is somewhat of a joke.
I can relate to that. My people come from a part of the world where raiders raped their way through every 20 years or so. Thus, I really have no idea what I am, in terms of nationality. And the same applies to the food of that region.
So, while she makes a good case, it got me to wondering. What, exactly, are the hallmarks of a specific cuisine. What, for instance, makes Italian cuisine what it is. Or French. Or Russian. Or African.
I thought this might make a good topic for discussion.
Frankly, it isn’t written very well. There are some serious historical and research errors in it. And it wouldn’t have suffered, any, by having a professional editor take a look. But her premise is interesting.
What Civitello maintains is that, because of the continual movement of peoples, and the melding of cultures, all cuisines consist of fusion foods, and the very idea of fusion being new is somewhat of a joke.
I can relate to that. My people come from a part of the world where raiders raped their way through every 20 years or so. Thus, I really have no idea what I am, in terms of nationality. And the same applies to the food of that region.
So, while she makes a good case, it got me to wondering. What, exactly, are the hallmarks of a specific cuisine. What, for instance, makes Italian cuisine what it is. Or French. Or Russian. Or African.
I thought this might make a good topic for discussion.
They have taken the oath of the brother in blood, in leavened bread and salt. Rudyard Kipling










