I ran across this article in the NY Times a few days ago about kids who are picky eaters:
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/10/di...=1&oref=slogin
I have a bit of a hard time believing some of this stuff, to tell the truth. First, kids won't starve if given the choice of being hungry or eating what is served to them. I started both my kids with pureed vegetables when they were babes, and always cooked a variety of healthy meals. If they didn't want to try something, I responed "This is what's for dinner. I may work in a restaurant, but I don't run one at home. Give it a try and if you truly don't like it, you don't have to eat it, but I'm not making anything else. Have another glass of milk if you're still hungry." No picky eating tendencies lasted for very long.
I believe that just as you have to teach kids to read, write, do math and survive in this world, part of that is to teach them how and what to eat and how to prepare it.
Second, I don't really understand how you can tease out and true control group in any study of this phenomenon. The writer admits that the parents of these children were, and are picky themselves, but doesn't eloborate on how it is genetic instead of repitition of observed behavior.
Lastly, the writer gives a description of the fact that 2-4s loose their sense of taste as a protective adaptation because stone-age children might run out of the cave an eat something poisonous. Kids up to 5 or 6 put all kinds of stuff in their mouths as a way of exploring their world and learning about it, so why wouldn't the exploration of different foods be any different.
I don't know, I'm no expert in child development or anthropology, but this article has lead to some lively discussions around here, and I though maybe some of you might like to chew it over too. :lips:
:D
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/10/di...=1&oref=slogin
I have a bit of a hard time believing some of this stuff, to tell the truth. First, kids won't starve if given the choice of being hungry or eating what is served to them. I started both my kids with pureed vegetables when they were babes, and always cooked a variety of healthy meals. If they didn't want to try something, I responed "This is what's for dinner. I may work in a restaurant, but I don't run one at home. Give it a try and if you truly don't like it, you don't have to eat it, but I'm not making anything else. Have another glass of milk if you're still hungry." No picky eating tendencies lasted for very long.
I believe that just as you have to teach kids to read, write, do math and survive in this world, part of that is to teach them how and what to eat and how to prepare it.
Second, I don't really understand how you can tease out and true control group in any study of this phenomenon. The writer admits that the parents of these children were, and are picky themselves, but doesn't eloborate on how it is genetic instead of repitition of observed behavior.
Lastly, the writer gives a description of the fact that 2-4s loose their sense of taste as a protective adaptation because stone-age children might run out of the cave an eat something poisonous. Kids up to 5 or 6 put all kinds of stuff in their mouths as a way of exploring their world and learning about it, so why wouldn't the exploration of different foods be any different.
I don't know, I'm no expert in child development or anthropology, but this article has lead to some lively discussions around here, and I though maybe some of you might like to chew it over too. :lips:
:D







