Wusthof sure as hell didnt, and their Rockwell is not 58 it's 55 to 57. Globals is 56\58 and Shuns is 61.
Now I have been working in a kitchen store for a few months now where we have all of these knives in store. Im not a professional chef but I live with professional chefs, talk to chefs and sell to chefs on a dayly basis, allso met up with 2 of the CEO's of Shun in Europe a few weeks ago when they visited my shop. Even though the OP has probably bought his knives allready im still gonna give it my five cents
Globals: Wierd handle which some like and some hate, gyoto formed blade (in short, gyoto is a japanese approach to the western chefs knife, a larger portion of the blade is flat and the curve starts all the way at the end, gives a larger contact area with the board) supporting both a european style knife technique aswell as chopping (larger contact area equals better for chopping), light weight and thin blades. Very easy to clean, rockwell 56-58. Somewhat flexible blades, japanese edge, 15 degree angle (15 on each side actual edge is 30)
Wusthof: Heavy, buildt like a tank, soft and thick blade. European style blade supporting a european style knife technique where the tip of the blade never leaves the board. Too thick to support any kind of flexibility. European edge, 20 degree angle (actual edge 40)
Shun: Medium weight, thin and hard blade. European style knife supporting a european style knife technique where the tip of the blade never leaves the board. But still the curve of the blade starts a little later then the Wusthof but still isent really a good knife for chopping style movements or mincing. Japanese edge, 16 degree angle (actual edge 32). And most importaintly in my oppinion, they have a D shaped handle which fills MY hand in a very good way. Perfect for a right handed user
Now all of these knives have subtle differences that means the edge retention is different in more then one way. The 20 degree angle of the Wusthofs is 33% thicker than a Globals, so even though the steel is softer it's going to retain it's edge for quite a while anyhow. Globals on the other hand are way sharper then a Wusthof in the first place, so if you keep them properly steeled theyre pretty much gonna be sharper then wusthofs regardless. Shuns on the other hand have a HRC of 61, and needs a different approach. Theyre edge retention is far better, but theyre significantly harder to sharpen correctly once they have dulled. A shun knife would allso benefit from more of a razor type edge that you would get from a 4000+ grit stone. While the Globals and Wusthofs are actually going to perform their best when sharpened on a 600 to 1000 stone. This is because the shuns have a harder steel which better supports the finer edge a 6000 or 12000 stone gives.
Now I personally HATE Wusthofs but one of my chef friends said that the next time he's gonna buy a new chefs knife he's gonna buy one. And he has allready had everything from Mac to Globals to Shuns and other brands. So really it's all about this and thats, tradeoffs and preferrences. Really, you can discuss this for the rest of your life and you wouldnt find an answer.
So my conclusion in the end, buy a Vulkanus Sharpener, dont worry, be happy! ;P Really, Vulkanus Professional is incredibly good, it decimates both Chefs Choice 120 and the others, same with Minosharp Sharpener, Wusthof Sharpener doesnt even begin to compare, nothing really does. It does shave some steel off your knives and you need to make a cut in something to get rid of the metal shavings after use (for instance a plastic pen) but damn that thing makes all those worries about sharp knives go away. Don't worry, be happy! ;) Sitting here with a 5 USD Scanapan knife in my hand (pic below) and after a goaround with the Vulkanus it's sharp enough that I can shave my arms with it... Absolute ridicilousness, i love it! :P
