New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Porsche vs Global Knives

post #1 of 14
Thread Starter 
Hey everyone,

I am just about to start working in the kitchen full time under my local pub's head chef, and I need to get the basic three knife set (chefs, carving and paring). The head chef told me to pick up the Porsche set, but after reading online I heard that Global are very popular. Price aside, which is a better set of knives?

Any help would be appreciated!
post #2 of 14
Well at least you're looking at Japanese western style knives -- it's a good place to start.

Globals are light, agile and made with good steel (Chromova 18) -- a step or two up from what's common with the European manufacturers. I actually know several people who have used them professionally or in the home; and several more whom I "know" online. Every single one of them who's used a Global chef's knife as his or her primary knife has discontinued using it as a result of hand pain after 3 months to a year. Every single one of them demoed the knife before buying, too. It's not like it was immediately uncomfortable. The problem developed over time. Most of the pros also found the handle "slippery." Holding it tightly to keep it under control might have been the problem.

I don't know anything about the Chroma/Porsche through "real" or virtual friends. My impression is that the handle so stylized and so ergonomic it looks like it's going to hurt. I just don't like their looks.

Avoid Furi no matter what. They take a dull and hold it. An edge -- not so much.

I wouldn't worry about a matched set. For someone in your position -- entry level pro -- I'd spend a little on a Cook's knife and whatever else you'll use second, and less on everything else. Get a MAC Chef series 10" chef's knife and a MAC Original series 9" carving knife. These are easy to keep sharp, and very comfortable. They're not the prettiest knives in the world, but they'll give you a lot of work for the money. They take a great edge, hold it well, and are very light. Somewhat cheap looking, and maybe a little on the flexible side.

The best small paring knives for peeling small vegetables are the little Forschner Fibrox serrated. They're so cheap you can throw them away when they get dull, but they actually take a keen edge. Half the working pros I know swear by the little serrated parer for small knife tasks. I'm not sure how much they are in the UK, but I'd bet you can get half a dozen for under 15 pounds. But, you'll want something a little longer for most things -- and in many situations you may not want something as small as the Forschner serrated at all.

There's a MAC Superior 4" with a "santoku," "sheep's foot" profile which makes straight cuts, as for fanning, easier -- good for fine tip work, but not great for piercing. There's also a 5" regular, utility shape in the same line which sells for the same price here.

I don't own any MAC knives, so I'm not trying to get you to validate my own choices. Also, I haven't worked in a pro in decades; but if I were starting again, that's the kit I'd like to do it with.

The main thing is to have knives that won't fight you -- and the MACs qualify. They're entry level, and you'll probably grow out of all of them in a year or two, but by that time you'll know enough about how you use a knife and what you use it for to take the step up with assurance.

You can spend less money and get Forschner Fibrox with pretty much the same "won't fight you" guarantee. But Forschners -- especially the chef's knife -- aren't as agile. In fact, the chef's knife is downright clumsy. Also all Forschners dull pretty fast -- although they're ridiculously easy to sharpen, so that's a kind of balance.

Last thought: Both the Porsches and the Globals have stainless handles. Do you NEED a "diswasher safe" knife? If so, you might want to google "Brieto."
Good luck,
post #3 of 14
Thread Starter 
Thank you!

I will be able to get the 3 set of Porsche knives for half price, so I think I will go with that option, as I would like to purchase a set. Having a non-dishwasher safe knife is fine, I don't mind washing them by hand! :)
post #4 of 14
Let us know how it goes moving to the kitchen -- and how those Porsche/Chromas work for you. The handle has me scared to death, and reminds me of the old joke about Porsche -- that since they had the car's design perfected, next year they're going to start redesigning the driver.

But they're sure stylish.

post #5 of 14
I would really, really, really caution you about purchasing knives without having ever tried them. Knives are as personal as a haircut, car or style of furniture; what works for one may not work for another. Knives are an extension of your hand and are a constant reminder of a poor choice. Price does not always matter, either. It is what works best for you. I swear by my $100 12" Forschner, others hate it. I relish my $30 high-carbon slicer.... wouldn't replace it with a million-dollar version. Chose wisely!

Invention, my dear friends, is ninety-three percent perspiration, six percent electricity, four percent evaporation, and two percent butterscotch ripple

My Author Page


Invention, my dear friends, is ninety-three percent perspiration, six percent electricity, four percent evaporation, and two percent butterscotch ripple

My Author Page

post #6 of 14
I have the porsche knives and love them, the handle is suprizingly comfortable and the really stand out over the "everyone has them" globals. They are often on e-bay for a reasonable price. I bought my 10 chefs knife for 35.00 new, so that is a good place to look IMO.
They hold their edge very well but require a sharpening stone to keep it up, they recommend DO NOT use a steel on them as it will ruin the blade.
I think they are a good choice.
Fluctuat nec mergitur
Fluctuat nec mergitur
post #7 of 14
Words to live by!....

I went threw a few costly mistakes until I found my shuns! GL!
post #8 of 14
Global knifes are ok *rich house wife knifes* as we call them in our kitchen i use a shun knife its very very good but its made from a soft metal

But dont go out and go willy nilly on exepensive knifes globals are over price i reccommend victorinox knives cheap reliable stay sharp ligh cant go wrong ill note again they are cheap if its your first set of knifes dont worry about an exepensive set you get what you need to get you through then when your more advanced i would defenitly reccomend Shun's
post #9 of 14
what about them new west knives?? are they any good?
post #10 of 14
Here, in the States, Globals are priced competitively with Shun Classic. I don't know about the UK. Since they're both Japanese knives, I'm surprised to hear they're overpriced compared to Shun.

Shun Classic, which presumably is the knife Apprentice uses, is a san mai knife, which means it's made with a hard steel core with softer "metal" on the outside; the edge itself is on the core. Traditionally, this was done in sword construction because Japanese sword steel was so hard and brittle it needed to be protected -- and Japanese smiths found that this method was one way to transfer some of the properties of a softer metal like flexibility, ease of sharpening, etc., to the harder. However, Shun Classics use a core of VG-10 which is not only a very good (just short of great) knife steel, and doesn't need san mai protection at all. Instead, it's a way of getting a suminigashi ("Damascus" look) to the knife. Although Shun USA claims the pattern is somehow "non-stick," it is not non-stick in a meaningful way. The pattern is merely cosmetic.

Globals are made from a proprietary steel called "Chromova 18." From a performance standpoint, it's similar to VG-10 in every way. Global hardens it to Rockwell Hardness 58, while Shun takes VG-10 t0 61, but the outer layers are much softer.

For what it's worth -- in a lesson that few self-styled "knife experts" ever seem to learn -- the Rockwell number is just not that informative. The four most important properties in knife steel, defined in "terms of art," are edge-taking, edge holding, toughness and strength. The level of strength is defined by the steel's ability to resist permanent deformation (not breakage). Rockwell Hardness is the measure of the steel's resistance to forming a permanent dimple from the measured pressure applied to a pointed, awl-like tool. (Apprentice didn't bring it up, I did because you so often see it played like a trump card.)

Returning to Globals, they take and hold an edge as well as Shun Classic, and have as good a balance of strength and toughness. Since they're so closely priced, the real comparison comes in terms of visual appeal, comfort and utility. Most contributors to this thread seem to agree that's a very individual thing. Me less so. Based on listening to a lot of people who have used Globals for a long time -- I've come to believe that Global chef knives cause hand discomfort if used as the primary knife for more than a few months. It's a shame, because everything else about them is very nice for the price. They're light, agile knives which take and hold a good edge which is easily maintained on a steel. It's not their fault if they're good looking.

Most people like the handle ergonomics of Shun Classic. Most people like the blade too -- if they're coming from European knives. Compared to typical Japanese (or French, for that matter) knives the Shun Classic chef knife's profile handles awkwardly because the point is so high above the mid-line.

Here's a Shun: Bed Bath & Beyond Product
Here's an excellent Japanese knife at a similar price point (but a MUCH better knife!): Korin - Fine Japanese Tableware and Chef Knives
Here's a classic French profile: Cooking Knife 8 in : Au Carbone - Vintage : K Sabatier products
Here's a Global: Bed Bath & Beyond Product

Look at the knives where the spine goes into the handle (or bolster) and try to determine the midpoint between the bottom of the knife at the heel, and the spine. Mentally draw a line parallel to the line of the spine where it starts out straight before it starts to slope and:

The French knife starts a very gradual drop towards the point about 60% of the way down the spine. The point is even with the mid-point of the heel, i.e., right on the mid-line.

Compared to the French, the Global and Masamoto delay the drop, so the tip looks more rounded -- but the tip is on the midline.

The Shun takes a very smooth drop, like the French, but takes it late like the other Japanese knives. This results in a high point, with a lot of radius underneath it. Shun's idea seems to have been that the extra radius would make the knife easier to two-hand rock-chop, the extended top line would make the knife a better slicer, and the point could take care of itself. Sadly, reality is the other way around. Two-hand rock-chopping is not effected because it's the off-hand rather than the radius of the knife controlling stability and range of motion; and tip work becomes deucedly awkward.

Another design issue with the Shun is, that as Japanese knives go, it's a "thick" knife. This isn't really an issue for most people, though. Unless you're making sashimi or classic cuts, or a knife-geek, it isn't an issue at all. FWIW, the Global is a thinner knife.

Furthermore, while it's "Damascus" look exterior makes the Shun a very stylish knife, the wavy design scratches easily -- even cleaning with normal cleaning . Perhaps this is what Apprentice meant. In terms of the cosmetic this is actually pretty serious because the scratches can't be buffed out without buffing out the pattern -- and the pattern can't be brought back without a pretty complicated acid treatment which isn't DIY.

Where do Globals and Shun Classics fit in terms of other knives? Let's start with the idea that the levels of quality can be broken into three major groups, bottom, middle and top; and that each of those can be broken into a similar three subgroups: top of the middle, for instance. Also, some of the borders are blurry. Whether a knife is top of the middle or bottom of the top can be problematic.

Compared to their primary western competitors -- the top line "Germans" (a couple are actually Swiss or American) -- both the Globals and Shun Classics are competitive -- but not clearly better. Modern German steel, either X50CrMo or X45CrMoV is much better than the previous generation, and usually hardened to around HRc 55-57. Overall, they're not as good as the steels used in Globals or Shuns but the knives have an entirely different feel. If you prefer the "feel," handle, or blade profile of one particular type, there's not enough difference among any other brand to kibosh the choice.

Placing the Shun Classics and Globals among Japanese knives is weird. For one thing Global and Classic have much better market penetration in the west. So, compared to some of the more "exotic" labels, it's easier to try before you buy which is important to some people. But overall, Shun and Global are "top of the middle," and there are a number bottom of the top of the bottom choices at about the same price. For instance, Hiromoto G (I'm leaving the Hiromoto AS off the list because the core steel isn't stainless); Masamoto VG; MAC Professional; Hattori HD (beautiful Damascus pattern); Misono Moly; and Suisun Inox to name just a few. The top of the middle also includes a few bargain busters like MAC Superior and Kanetsugu M which give up some cosmetics but kick Global/Shun butt on performance.

(Not so tangentially -- a look at the list should give you the idea that the list of Japanese manufacturers making high quality western-style knives includes a lot more small and medium sized companies than the western world.)

Another manufacturer mentioned was Forschner. Their Fibrox/Rosewood lines (different handles, same knives) are very important in the entry-level pro market, as well as certain specific areas of food processing. They make another important line -- Victorinox Forged -- which is very different and a typical high-end German knife -- which also use X50CrMo (as do Wusthof). The following applies to Forschner Fibrox and Rosewood, but not to Victorinox Forged: The knives are stamped, rather than forged, and the handles are attached without a bolster -- which allow the knives to be sold at a very good price. First -- don't let "stamped" put you off. It used to be that "forged" meant "better," but that's no longer true and the Forschners are one of the reasons why. The catalog is HUGE -- they make a lot of shapes, and almost every one of them is an incredible performer at any price -- and a miracle for the price Forschner sells it. One of the few exceptions is their chef's knives. They "dull" quickly. Not "dull" so much in the sense that the steel wears down, but it rolls over easily. They can be brought back with frequent steeling, but also need frequent sharpening. Not a big deal with a knife that doesn't whack the board as much as a chef's -- but there you go. "Fibrox" is the line that gets the press; not that it isn't comfortable but IMO a Rosewood" is more so. I have a lot of experience with Forschner butchering (including fish) knives, and with their garde manger knives, and highly recommend them. Their chef's knife is probably the best available for anything near the price. It's the first step into the bottom of the middle -- and way better than anything near the top of the bottom. But in my opinion it's well worthwhile to spend more and step up to a MAC Chef or Kanetsugu Pro M -- 4 times the knife for twice the money.

If you're looking for a knife and reading this stuff, it's important to apply a filter to positive reviews of a knife currently used by the poster. Not to discount it too much, but consider whether the endorsement is based on a wide survey, whether the new knife is a lot better than the old, or it's a knife the writer has "always" used and loves -- and weigh it accordingly.

I'm pretty comfortable with the reasons people give when they HATE something. (For instance Apprentice doesn't like Globals because he thinks they're for amateurs. He's got a point too. The little suckers used to be everywhere in pro kitchens but you don't see them much anymore.) OTOH, I always wonder how much a positive recommendation is based on a desire for validation. Of course, this includes my own. One reason among many I stay away from endorsing what's currently in my block unless it's obvious you're "the type."

Two more cents,
post #11 of 14
Knives are very personal. What works for you at age 35, may cause great discomfort at 65. I know from experience. I own and have used the finest German and Japanese knives. Several years ago, I decided that Global worked best for me, and bought several. In a demonstration, I shaved my face with a Global nakiri, after having not shaved for three days. It was as though I was using a straight razor. But as B.D.L. noted, the shape of the handle began to feel uncomfortable to me, and as I became more aware of the discomfort, I used the Globals less and less.
If you are looking for high quality, but extremely modest prices, I suggest buying directly from Japan. Look at the Kanestsugu (link)Pro M Series.
An example:

$65.70 Gyuto 180mm Total Length:305mm BladeThickness:2mm Total Weight:140g
[quote]The blade is made of Molybdenum alloy high carbon stainless steel with traditional"Hamaguri ba" (Convex edge grind), the edge that made Japanese swords famous, for an outstanding sharpness and durability,and yet easy to resharpen. It is heat treated and then Sub Zero quenched. which refrigerates the blade to 70 degrees for longer edge retention and strength to brittleness and chipping.

Here's the URL: JapaneseChefsKnife.Com Top Page
Click on products. The site runs slowly. Even with your high speed line, pictures will come up slowly.
post #12 of 14
Great knife. Japanese Chef Knife is a great source, too. The owner, Koki, is honest and service oriented beyond belief. If you need something that's not on his site, or some special services -- ask. If you buy more than a couple of knives, ask for a discount. Some very good American e-sources for Japanese Knives include Epicurean Edge, Korin, Seito Trading; there are others.

The "around $80" price range for a 10" knife is by no means inexpensive. There are a few knives at ths price point which bring as much performance as the big name Wusthofs, Globals, Henckels and Shuns for far less money; and much more performance than a Forschner Fibrox -- for a lot more money. If you speak economics, Kanetsugu Pro M , MAC Chef, and Warther (a quirky American knife I haven't mentioned much) are about where the Law of Diminishing Returns (for cook's knives) starts to kick in pretty hard. This isn't to say that other, more expensive knives, don't perform better and aren't worth the money -- just that every dollar over the price of these knives buys increasingly less performance improvement.

I don't know who's reading this thread since it's started to wander so far afield. If you're thinking about buying a chef's knife and even $40 seems like a lot of money -- you don't need a really good knife to enjoy cooking. A $15 Cuisinart from Wal-Mart is plenty good enough to help you enjoy cooking -- as long as you keep it sharp. Don't beat yourself up over expensive equipment. Buy it when you can afford it.

A few other knife maxims:

1. Almost any sharp knife can perform almost any knife task.

2. Almost any sharp knife will do a better job of any task than almost any dull knife.

3. A dull knife, no matter how expensive, well balanced, or blessed with super design or "feel," is simply a dull knife.

post #13 of 14
I'll give you the short answer.


恵守 世羽棲知安

恵守 世羽棲知安
post #14 of 14
FWIW, Chroma are Porsche (and vice versa). It seems as if the OP followed your advice before you gave it.

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Cooking Knife Reviews