› ChefTalk Cooking Forums › Cooking Discussions › Food & Cooking › Manufacturing Cream
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Manufacturing Cream

post #1 of 47
Thread Starter 
This morning I stopped at one of the local Peet's for a cuppa joe, and to my chagrin, there was no cream on the counter to add to the coffee. There was soy milk, half-and-half, whole milk, and low-fat milk. I guess that's the typical Berkeley sensibility. But I wanted cream, so I asked the guy behind the counter for some and he pulled out a 1/2 gallon container of manufacturing cream produced by one of the local dairies. OK! It was real cream, but it didn't taste and feel like some cream I had recently. A friend buys Safeway cream, and it has a thicker mouth feel and doesn't taste as vibrant - it tastes sort of "dead" or almost spoiled. I've noticed a marked difference in the taste of milk and cream from the top rated local dairies and the commercial supermarket stuff. Coments?

Anyway, back to the manufacturing cream. Is it any different than regular heavy cream, or whipping cream, and if so, in what ways? Thanks!
post #2 of 47
it has a higher % of fat than heavy cream. The fat content is over 40%
post #3 of 47
Thread Starter 
Well, I did a little research and discovered that the Manufacturing Cream that I enjoyed this morning contained only cream, and the ingredient list for the Safeway Lucerne brand shows that it contains cream, polysorbate 80, carrageenan, and diglycerides. Sheesh! It never ceases to amaze me what garbage goes into the typical commercial foods we are sold. I also found out that these ingredients are in other brands of cream.

Why screw around with such a simple, staple item as cream? Based on my own tastings, the extra ingredients just degrade the taste and mess with the natural texture and mouth feel of the product.

JBD - thanks for the explanation of manufacturing cream.
post #4 of 47
All supermarket cream is homogenized and contain those ingredients and others like xantham gum, locust bean gum, gum arabic and more.

The simple answer is for stability and prevent the product from separating.

40% fat or more cream doesn't separate as much when stored and holds together after homogenizing.

Luc H.
I eat science everyday, do you?
I eat science everyday, do you?
post #5 of 47
Along with the fat content, take a look and see if the brands you prefer are single pasteurized. I try to stay away from the ultra-pasteurized cream.

post #6 of 47
Thread Starter 
I'll have to look into that. I'm not sure if that's correct, at least here in California with some of our premium brands. Unfortunately, many brands don't list their ingredients on their web sites - a trip to the market is in order, or at least a couple of phone calls or emails. <sigh>

Edit: OK, I found three brands of whipping cream which do not contain the carrageenan, polysorbate 80, various diglycerides, and the gums you mentioned. What is interesting is that one brand makes a pasteurized and an ultrapasteurized whipping cream, and the ultra pasteurized contains carrageenan while the regular pasteurized does not. The ultrapasteurized does not contain any of the other ingredients we are discussing.
post #7 of 47
Thread Starter 
I don't like ultrapasteurized anything ... I know at least one brand that isn't, and I think there are a couple of others as well.

Thanks for the heads-up.
post #8 of 47
Pasteurization and homogenization is not the same thing by the way.

Pasteurization has nothing to do with gum addition but homogenization does.
If a product is not homogenized then adding gums is useless.

Luc H.
I eat science everyday, do you?
I eat science everyday, do you?
post #9 of 47
Thread Starter 
Yes Luc, I know the difference. All the cream I mentioned was homogenized. It just seemed odd that the ultrapasteurized had the carrageenan and the regular pasteurized didn't.
post #10 of 47
the not so simple answer.....
carrageenan and other gums are added from thickness and mouthfeel.
It helps in whipping volume (in the case of heavy cream).
It also helps to hold the milkfat emulsion better under heating conditions like when cooking in sauces.
It makes the cream also more opaque for creaming/whitening coffee and even reduces oil drops from rising on the surface of the coffee.

Essentially manufacturers choose the gums and proportions to suit their clientele which also means to go without for purist like yourself. Whatever sells and niche markets are more profitable.

Luc H.
I eat science everyday, do you?
I eat science everyday, do you?
post #11 of 47
Hi Shel,

I avoid eating any ultra-pasteurized dairy along with carrageenan. I too am surprised that pasteurized heavy cream has no additives like carrageenan it in.

post #12 of 47
Thread Starter 
Well, as long as I can get the good quality cream, organic or otherwise, and not have to get the additives, I'm happy. I've not noticed oil drops rising to the top of my coffee with the "purist" version of the cream - I'll have to pay attention. Thanks!
post #13 of 47
Thread Starter 
As Luc pointed out, it's probably the purist version :)
post #14 of 47
I have no problem with thickeners such as carageenan, xanthan or other vegetable-derived gums, unless I hear of a reason to be concerned. If taste of a product is affected in a way that I don't like, then of course I care.

I think these stabilizers/emulsifiers serve a good purpose and make some things, such as ice cream, better sometimes.
post #15 of 47

Have a go at making it yourself!

Well I live over here in France and buying decent cream is impossible! It is impossible to whip and has zero flavour. When I asked local French people about it they tend to buy Chantilly in cans!!!!
My solution was to search on ebay for a cream making attachment for my Kenwood chef. It couldn't be easier. Melt some butter with some milk. Pour into the machine which turns it into cream within a couple of minutes and then just add a little sugar to taste. Whilst not exactly slimming there is no risk of any nasty additives. Highly recommended alternative and the taste difference is huge. I now have all my French mates requesting batches of cream when they come over, that and traditional English trifle which is also a firm favourite!!
post #16 of 47
Thread Starter 
We'll just have to disagree. I don't care if an additive is good, bad, or neutral - as far as I'm concerned it doesn't belong in a natural product. In most instances it's a cheap fix. For generations ice cream was just fine without gums, stabilizers, and additives. Now these additives make it "better." I don't think so.

What the heck is wrong with eating things in their natural state? Thank goodness there's still a choice, so you can eat your additive laden and overly processed commercially produced ice cream and I can eat a more natural product.
post #17 of 47
Shel- I couldn't agree more! Glad to know there is someone else out there that thinks the same way as I do.

Happy cooking.
post #18 of 47
Thread Starter 
One of the concerns I have with additive laden food is that we will forget what real food tastes like. In many instances many people already have. The food they eat is loaded with various chemicals, additives, fillers, and whatnot, that the true taste of the food is compromised or masked.

Since OY brought up ice cream, I keep thinking back to a test that Cook's Illustrated did on vanilla ice creams. The winning ice creams used emulsifiers and stabilizers to get the texture and taste that satisfied the testers. The test was conducted pretty much on supermarket brands, which, IMO, are at best mediocre. It would have been interesting to see how the results would have been had the test been conducted with some of the ice creams made in small shops by people dedicated to making a quality, natural product.

Unfortunately, economics plays a big role in what we eat. It's cheaper and more expeditious to just crank out dreck than it is to spend time making a quality product. However, at least here in the San Francisco Bay Area. and, from what I read, in several other places around the US, there is something of a backlash forming. More and more people are getting out of the supermarket aisles and down to their farmers' markets, and finding butchers and ranchers who are producing the quality food that they crave, and frankly, that our society and environment needs.
post #19 of 47
Thread Starter 
I forgot to ask: What is the good purpose these stabilizers and emulsifiers provide, and in what way do they make some things better, and by better I mean compared to a well made product without the additives?
post #20 of 47
.... wow.... i'm speechless.... no good cream in France... I thought that's where cream came from...

I completely understand and agree with your point - additives are in the majority of the foods we buy. I'm even suspicious of reading labels very often because I'm quite sure the food contains even MORE additives than what they list - only there is no law invented yet to make them do so.

The problem with the additives (and I'm primarily speaking about high fructose corn syrup here) is that since its "invention" in the 1970's it has been used to spike all common foods. Foods you wouldn't imagine needed added sweetness like canned vegetable broth... ?? These additives change the flavor of food while simultaneously causing you to be addicted to them. At this point we have to relearn how to taste food. I've recently switched to organic peanut butter with no additives and I gotta tell ya it's not easy to get used to the flavor. I'm trying to tell myself "this is what it's SUPPOSED to taste like so get used to it" but it's hard when you're used to skippy. And it's not just peanut butter, it's everything!

Now couple that dilemma with the fact that "organic" "whole" and other endearing terminology is officially a fad that is being capitalized on and we all know what happens when we try to capitalize on a good thing - we get carried away with it and ruin it. The law of supply and demand suggests that we'll be paying a lot more money for good food until all of us are on board. I just don't trust it completely. The prices are outrageous when they should be LESS and you have to have some kind of "special person" pass to even enter these granola stores.

Things are so different now. Not long ago you only had to be aware of calories, fat and fiber. Now we have to check if it's organic, if the animals were treated well, what form of shipment was used for our produce, and suddenly we have to know the meanings of all those words on labels that I can't pronounce. Don't get me wrong - this is important for us to do and I'm glad we're finally waking up as a nation. But taking on this sort of thinking does not feel natural at first and it's making me a little paranoid. I just wish there was a simpler way to make the adjustments.

"You are what you eat, so don't be fast, cheap, easy, or fake."


"You are what you eat, so don't be fast, cheap, easy, or fake."

post #21 of 47
Vegetable gums are one of the few additives I don't mind. I agree with you guys (Shel, Penguin, Mapiva) in general, for almost all "additives", although even that is not always a clear-cut word. Is salt an additive? In what foods is sugar an additive, and in what foods not?

Is ascorbic or citric acid an additive and/or preservative? Lemons and other fruits in their natural state contain these exact compounds. See where I'm going? Is granulated white sugar a processed food?
post #22 of 47
Additives = longer self life.
post #23 of 47
Longer shelf life? Or longer self life? The 2 are very different things. If we all just stuck to eating food that had short shelf life we'd be better off. Now excuse me as I open a can of tuna fish that I bought last march and was caught how long before that?

"You are what you eat, so don't be fast, cheap, easy, or fake."


"You are what you eat, so don't be fast, cheap, easy, or fake."

post #24 of 47
Mapiva, I avoid most additives and it has been interesting to see dinner guests response to my cooking. 70% LOVE the dinner. They eat and eat and eat and can't stop talking about the food. They love the taste and enjoy the pure ingredients.

The other 30% eat their meal and don't say a word. It's different than their can of cream of chicken soup so they don't enjoy it. . . It's a different taste and I agree with you there is a learning process where you have to relearn what food is supposed to taste like.

As for the peanut butter, we switched to organic a few months ago and my husband also said "is this what peanut butter is supposed to taste like??? It's really peanutty." We've been eating it and hoping we would get used to it. Just yesterday he opened a bottle of Skippy from the basement and gagged on his sandwich. The peanut butter we loved for years now tastes like crisco with a light peanut flavoring. :)

post #25 of 47
It seems that most of the additives are there to change texture as well. "Real peanut butter" seems really grainy too me and there's oil on the top that has to be reworked in. It's mostly the texture that has me thrown off. It's not just that it's everything. Real mashed potatoes compared to the boxed stuff, canned mushrooms vs. real, boxed cake vs. homemade, the list never ends.

"You are what you eat, so don't be fast, cheap, easy, or fake."


"You are what you eat, so don't be fast, cheap, easy, or fake."

post #26 of 47
Thread Starter 
I've not purchased jarred peanut butter in about ten years, maybe more, and stopped buying Skippy-type peanut butter in 1979, preferring non-hydrogenated oil nothing added peanut butter. The only peanut better I eat now is fresh ground, organic that I grind myself either in the machines in any one of several organic groceries or sometimes at home. The difference in taste, even compared to jarred organic peanut butter, is substantial - much better and more like real peanuts. I don't use salted peanuts. In addition, there's no oil floating on top of this freshly ground peanut butter. I don't know why that is. Perhaps because the grind is a little coarser or because there's no oil added to the final product, as there is with some peanut butters.

Every now and then, when at a friend's house, I may take a taste of regular peanut butter - Skippy, Jiffy, whatever, or one of the peanut butters that are more natural, without the hydrogenated oils, sugar, and less heavily salted. Ugh! I can see why a lot of people eat that sugared stuff as we, as a society, have become accustomed to the taste of sugar in so many prepared foods, and the sugared-hydrogenated-salted peanut butters taste like what we have come to expect. These are the ingredients found in one of the commercial supermarket brands, Jiffy I think:
Peanuts, corn syrup solids, sugar and soy protein, contains
two percent or less of: fully hydrogenated vegetable oils
(rapeseed and soybean), salt, mono- and diglycerides,
molasses, niacinamide, folic acid, pyridoxine hydrochloride,
magnesium oxide, zinc oxide, ferric orthophosphate, and
copper sulfate.
Try grinding your own peanut butter some time and see how it compares with the jarred stuff stuff you're buying.

BTW, you might find this Natural Peanut Butter Hand Mixer, this Peanut Butter Mixer or this Peanut Butter Mixer of some use.
post #27 of 47
Thread Starter 
Salt and sugar that is added to a food is - an additive. As far as I'm concerned, those ingredients are always additives.
post #28 of 47
Shelf life :blush: so I can't type :lol:
post #29 of 47
So then, 99% of ice cream has an additive-sugar.
post #30 of 47
Thread Starter 
Not exactly. Ice cream is a compound concoction, and sugar or another sweetener is needed to make ice cream. Peanut butter, otoh, is just peanuts, and suger would be an additive in that case.

What's needed to make ice cream? Milk or cream, a sweetener such as sugar, flavoring (such as vanilla), sometimes eggs ... carrageenan, xanthan gum, propylene glycol, polysorbate 80, eye of newt are not needed to make ice cream and they are, therefore, additives.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Food & Cooking › ChefTalk Cooking Forums › Cooking Discussions › Food & Cooking › Manufacturing Cream