Brief clarification. As far as I know, most Western knife enthusiasts who are into Japanese knives are quite hot to trot about gyutos. My point is that the knife makers in question aren't, as a rule. That's not to say that Masamoto or whoever does a shoddy job with them, but their gyutos are just not where they put their best foot forward. I like them anyway, of course, and they are wonderful knives, but it's worth bearing in mind that the Japanese knife-makers don't look at their lines the same way most Western purchasers do.
As to the santoku, I think it predates Rachael Ray, but not by a whole lot. I've had a good bit of trouble hunting down where this fascination came from, in fact. What I find particularly striking is just how absolutely classified this knife is in Japan: it's a home knife, period, full stop. Nobody but a home cook would ever use one. It is designed for home use, marketed to home cooks, and it stays there. A gyuto is fairly unusual in being a border-crosser: it does turn up in both professional and home kitchens, though in neither case is it a common appearance. A deba is very common in all kitchens; a yanagiba very common in pro kitchens and not uncommon -- in very short lengths, like 195mm -- in home kitchens. And the usuba is entirely a pro knife. In essence the santoku (or nakiri) and usuba are mirror-images: the former are home knives requiring minimal skill and having minimal good qualities, and the latter are pro knives requiring immense skill and having extraordinary good qualities.
What I can't understand is why the santoku, of all knives, should have gotten picked up on TV: why push one of the very, very few knives I know of that is so absolutely limited, whose good qualities are strictly based on the user having poor skills, a tiny kitchen, bad sharpening habits, and little money to spend?
Or did I just answer my own question? (Now you see my hypothesis....)
As to the santoku, I think it predates Rachael Ray, but not by a whole lot. I've had a good bit of trouble hunting down where this fascination came from, in fact. What I find particularly striking is just how absolutely classified this knife is in Japan: it's a home knife, period, full stop. Nobody but a home cook would ever use one. It is designed for home use, marketed to home cooks, and it stays there. A gyuto is fairly unusual in being a border-crosser: it does turn up in both professional and home kitchens, though in neither case is it a common appearance. A deba is very common in all kitchens; a yanagiba very common in pro kitchens and not uncommon -- in very short lengths, like 195mm -- in home kitchens. And the usuba is entirely a pro knife. In essence the santoku (or nakiri) and usuba are mirror-images: the former are home knives requiring minimal skill and having minimal good qualities, and the latter are pro knives requiring immense skill and having extraordinary good qualities.
What I can't understand is why the santoku, of all knives, should have gotten picked up on TV: why push one of the very, very few knives I know of that is so absolutely limited, whose good qualities are strictly based on the user having poor skills, a tiny kitchen, bad sharpening habits, and little money to spend?
Or did I just answer my own question? (Now you see my hypothesis....)






