AJ,
Where we left off:
As you've discovered with your carbon Sabs, there's a world of difference between sharp, agile knives and the regular German style, Euro stainless most people use. If you really want to give your friends stainless knives which provide sharpness AND agility -- which is self evidently the case -- that moves you into Japanese made knives. But then sharpening raises it's big ol' head and confusion reigns.
Is there any chance you can talk to the soon to be minted culinary grads about knives before buying these gifts? If you like you can put them together with me and I'll go through the whole analysis schtick that seems to help with making the choice -- at least for some people.
Even if you're used to a German profile, the adjustment to French is easy and doesn't take much thought. One "rock chops" as well as the other. French knives move around the board more easily and don't require the handle to be "pumped" as much. On the other hand German knives provide a little more power which is primarily useful when the knife is quite dull.
Good Euros:
If I were If I were the one making a gift of a European made knives you've discussed, it would be one of the Sabatiers for their wonderful profiles and handles rather than the Lamson. Messermeisters are very nice (maybe a little out of your price range, though).
Wusthof Ikons are fairly light and move around pretty well. In terms of profile and agility, they're a nice sort of compromise between Japanese and German knives. Unfortunately, they're made from the same mediocre, soft "German steel" alloy as nearly everything else (including inexpensive Forschners) at the German high end (Messers are a quarter step better), and are almost double what you want to spend. In the end, because they're all made from X50CrMoV15 or something very much like it, because they're all so beautifully made, because they're by and large so well supported, because they all have excellent handles, etc., one good German knive is pretty much like another.
Bottom Line on Euro Stainless:
One of the Sabatiers, or Messermeister if you can afford it.
Globals:
There are a lot of nice things to say about Global and some not so nice. As one of the first Japanese knives in the western market they enjoyed a huge burst of popularity and respect in the US, but aren't nearly as sought after as they once were. They are still quite popular in other parts of the world, especially the UK, Oz and NZ.
On the plus side, the profiles are extremely well done and they are quite agile compared to anything with a German profile and are better in that respect than many Japanese made French profile knives. No kidding, they are really agile -- almost Sabatier/Masamoto like. Also, they are EXTREMELY well finished -- and not just for Japanese knives.
Most of them (except for the larger, forged chef's) are designed for a dead neutral balance. Some people like that and some people don't. Most skilled cutters don't care much; but "most" is by no means all and your friends may have their own opinions.
On the debit side of the ledger the easiest problem to point out is the handle. Some people don't like them right off the bat; and quite a few others fall out of love after a few months. Since I don't have a problem with them, I can only tell you what I've gleaned -- and that is that is they feel insecure, which promotes a death grip, which in turn leads to hand pain. This is especially true in a professional environment. On the other hand, you don't hear a lot of that from Europe or "the Empire." My feeling is that the problems originate with imperfect grip mechanics and/or poor sharpness (causing the cutter to use more force than (s)he would with a very sharp knife).
Whether or not you like the handle the blade is quite thick (around 3mm) and despite it's great profile will wedge as badly as any Wusthof or Lamson.
Now we get into the real problem areas which are edge holding and edge taking. Tyler did a good job of talking about the edge holding deficiencies (h/t Tyler). Besides those, it's just darn difficult to ever put a good edge on a Global. The underlying problem is the alloy itself, CroMoVa18, which has enough chromium (18% as opposed to the 13% minimum "stainless" standard), it could be a dive knife. It's amazing it takes as good an edge as it does, but that's nowhere near as good as what you can do with one of your Sabs or nearly any other Japanese made stainless knife in or above its price range.
Back to the positve side, while Global makes a big deal out of using special sharpening gear, the knives actually sharpen pretty well on oilstones. In fact, I think they actually sharpen better on Indias and Arkansas stones than on most waterstones.
Bottom Line on the Globals:
Unlike most knife guys, I actually like them (for the agility and the handle). Comparing a Global to a Lamson is like comparing a Porsche to a Suburban. But, they're made of an alloy which is lousy in every way other than corrosion resistance. The verdict on Global is the same, for different reasons, as for Shun. There are better Japanese knives for the less money, and much better for the same.
Chris,
Since you haven't mentioned your source for claiming the Misono Moly and the FKM are made from the same steel, can we assume the assertion is no longer in play?
No one's recommending $300+ cutlery. If you want to debate the merits of this or that knife, you don't need to resort to a "straw man."
I don't consider myself to be the last word on any knife in particular, knives in general, or anything else culinary or otherwise. Whatever you say about your experiences I accept and add to my internal database as one more entry in the file of other people's contributions. I treat your suppositions and conclusions with as much respect as I treat anyone's, including my own. Admittedly, that is not a whole lot.
I'm more than happy to stipulate that the FKM has good -- even very good -- fit and finish for a Japanese knife in its price range. It's certainly hugely better than older Tojiro DPs; and largely better than current DPs for that matter. However, you have to admit that compared to other choices in quality Japanese made western knives, both are "entry level" and/or "student," and priced accordingly. Perhaps it's just class prejudice, but I think a graduation present is worth one step up.
I don't know how many FKM's and Misono Molys I've seen. Perhaps a half dozen FKMs and a dozen Molys. In my experience, the Molys -- taken as a class -- have better F&F than the Fujiwaras. Your experience is different. I'm sure AJ and everyone else reading this thread appreciates it. I know I do. In addition, I believe most people would say Misono Moly's have better profiles and more comfortable handles than the FKMs. My impression is that edge taking and holding are similar, but that they are not made of the same alloy. At any rate, they don't feel the same on the stones. Also (obviously, in my opinion), the Misonos do represent that one step. Your opinion is otherwise, which is fine by me.
If I seem aggressive about going after (what I think) is misinformation, all I can ask is that you balance that against my patience to explain and willingness to stand corrected when shown to be wrong. It may not be pretty, but it's how I learn.
BDL
Edited by boar_d_laze - 11/10/10 at 11:44am