or Connect
ChefTalk.com › ChefTalk Cooking Forums › Q&As With Guest Professional Chefs › Q&A With Steven Raichlen › wet wood = creosote not smoldering smoke
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

wet wood = creosote not smoldering smoke

post #1 of 2
Thread Starter 

This is a personal theory of mine, but not one I'm equipped to prove. But I thought I'd run it by you.

 

Creosote forms in the smoke more readily at lower combustion temperatures, under 250. Creosote is usually a by-product of a poorly burning fire.

 

A clean burning fire produces a better tasting smoke.  Which is a less visible smoke as well.

 

With the hassles of managing a low  even  temp in the cooking chamber adding a wet piece of wood that will burn poorly just seems like a bad idea for best flavor.

 

I burn more wood chunks this way, true, but I like the flavor better. But this is not a blind unbiased tasting.

 

Thanks,

 

Phil

 

post #2 of 2

Phil, your observations make sense, though like you, I am not in a position to speak scientifically to them. In truth, chunks of wood that are soaked really don't absorb much water, even if submerged overnight. So eventually, the fire eats its way to dry wood, which provides the "clean" smoke you reference above. Sometimes, I use dry wood on purpose--and state that in the specific recipe. (This includes wood chips, too.) Experimentation is all part of the fun, would you agree?

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Q&A With Steven Raichlen
ChefTalk.com › ChefTalk Cooking Forums › Q&As With Guest Professional Chefs › Q&A With Steven Raichlen › wet wood = creosote not smoldering smoke