So, I saw the reprise of the original, and tonights new episode.
My first thought: Given the stage of their careers, each of the contestents should be a strong competitor. Lot's of cooking chops, there, learned under some of the best in the business, reflected by the awards they've earned. Wouldn't surprise me if this is the strongest season yet, in terms of cooking talent.
That said, I was a bit put out with the selection process. During the first episode there wasn't a hint of a level playing field between the two groups. Different rules, different foods, different judges.
That was bad enough. Then came tonight's show, and, whatinhell was that? It wasn't close to fair. We saw the antithesis of a level playing field between the ten finalists, and no relationship between what they had to accomplish and the first 20. They certainly had a harder job of it than did either of the other groups.
Does anyone really believe that there's any basis for comparing a blue-coat winner from the first group with a loser from the third?
If this is a taste of things to come, I fear we're going to see some really over-the-top, inequitable challenges in the coming weeks.