Induction is definitely different. Its fast....very fast. So, there is no waiting for the pan to heat up or the water to boil. Consequently, there is no ambient heat above the burners that some cooks like to use from time to time. That also means less residual heat in the pan. This will take some getting used to. But, from what I am told, getting used to the differences in control and heat is not very difficult with practice and some patience.
Most pots and pans work on an induction stove, so that's not a problem. If a magnet will stick to it, it will work.
Induction is said to be cheaper because it cooks faster and there is less wasted heat. It also translates into a cooler kitchen, which could be a wonderful blessing.
The only real drawback I can see is that if the induction stove were to have an issue, its more likely for that issue to take the entire unit offline, which is never good for a commercial kitchen, especially during rush. But, in terms of overall reliability, its said that induction is more reliable than gas. That seems to be a very subjective statistic to me. I can't recall the last time I had an issue with a gas stove aside from a starter wearing out from time to time.
From what I have read, induction stoves seem to have become quite popular. Given their advantages in speed and their unmatched ability to maintain specific temperatures indefinitely (not to mention safety), I think an induction stove would be a good idea.
As for what brands, I can't answer that. I know that some gas stove manufacturers such as Viking have gotten into the induction market. Other than that......
Good luck!
